USCL ranks 7th and NULG 29th of 47 funds in the US ESG & Values Index Category.
NULG vs USCL
USCL −0.18pt a year
0.26%0.08%
NULG 6.3×the volume
82.6K13.1K
USCL +0.2pt
+19.7%+19.9%
NULG vs USCL Performance
+7.7%+9.6%
- NULG 0.26%
- USCL 0.08%, better
- NULG $2.76B
- USCL $2.61B
- NULG +7.7%
- USCL +9.6%, better
- NULG 0.11%
- USCL 1.06%, better
- NULG 78
- USCL 393
- NULG 82.6K sh, better
- USCL 13.1K sh
- NULG $102.12
- USCL $83.10
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NULG | USCL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C46 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | F16 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | A72Higher | B69 |
| Holdings | D32 | D34Higher |
| Durability | A80Higher | A71 |
Rank among US ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. NULG and USCL are both graded against the same 47 US ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NULGB
USCLA
In short
NULG Most ESG funds hand you the whole US market and call it a day. NULG picks a lane: a compact bench of large-cap growth names run through TIAA's own ESG screen, so the values filter and the style tilt arrive in one ticker.
USCL Most ESG index funds work by exclusion. USCL scores roughly 400 US large and mid caps on where they're heading instead: emissions intensity, reduction targets, green revenue. And it charges 0.08% a year to do it.
Stated mandate
NULG The Fund seeks to track the investment results of the TIAA ESG USA Large-Cap Growth Index, which holds ESG-screened equity securities issued by large-capitalization companies listed on U.S. exchanges.
USCL The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies selected for their relative positioning on the transition to a low-carbon economy, using climate-related measures such as emissions intensity, reduction targets, green-business revenue, and climate-risk management.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NULG vs USCL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NULG vs USCL Cost
Overpaying NULG vs USCL
$3,669
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NULG 0.26%
$5,358
USCL 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NULG | USCL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $473 | $147 | $326 |
| 20 | $1,838 | $575 | $1,263 |
| 30 | $5,358 | $1,689 | $3,669 |
- 0.26%NULG
- 0.08%USCL, cheaper
- Middle half of US ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.25%
USCL cheapest of 47 funds
NULG 25th cheapest of 47 funds
NULG vs USCL Dividends
- NULG 0.11%
- USCL 1.06%, better
- NULG $0.11
- USCL $0.91
- NULG $0.11
- USCL $0.20
- NULG Dec 18, 2025
- USCL Sep 15, 2026
- NULG Dec 19, 2025
- USCL Sep 18, 2026
- NULG Annual
- USCL Quarterly
Distribution history
NULG vs USCL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NULG 17.4%USCL 12.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- NULG 1.01USCL 1.28, better
- Worst fall
- NULG −35.8%USCL −19.0%
- Market sensitivity
- NULG 1.21USCL 1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.26% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.