USCL ranks 8th and NULV 16th of 47 funds in the US ESG & Values Index Category.
NULV vs USCL
USCL −0.18pt a year
0.26%0.08%
NULV 16.2×the volume
213K13.1K
USCL +0.3pt
+21.2%+21.5%
NULV vs USCL Performance
+25.1%+7.3%
- NULV 0.26%
- USCL 0.08%, better
- NULV $2.6B
- USCL $2.77B
- NULV +25.1%, better
- USCL +7.3%
- NULV 1.35%, better
- USCL 1.06%
- NULV 128
- USCL 394
- NULV 213K sh, better
- USCL 13.1K sh
- NULV $54.47
- USCL $85.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NULV | USCL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C46 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A74 | |
| Risk | A84Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | A78Higher | A70 |
| Holdings | B60Higher | D36 |
| Durability | A80Higher | A70 |
Rank among US ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. NULV and USCL are both graded against the same 47 US ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NULVB
USCLA
In short
NULV Most ESG funds hand you the whole market with the worst offenders stripped out. NULV picks a lane: large-cap US value stocks that clear an ESG screen, tracking a TIAA index in a portfolio of roughly 100 names.
USCL Most ESG index funds work by exclusion. USCL scores roughly 400 US large and mid caps on where they're heading instead: emissions intensity, reduction targets, green revenue. And it charges 0.08% a year to do it.
Stated mandate
NULV The Fund seeks to track the investment results of the TIAA ESG USA Large-Cap Value Index before fees and expenses.
USCL The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies selected for their relative positioning on the transition to a low-carbon economy, using climate-related measures such as emissions intensity, reduction targets, green-business revenue, and climate-risk management.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NULV vs USCL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NULV vs USCL Cost
Overpaying NULV vs USCL
$3,669
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NULV 0.26%
$5,358
USCL 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NULV | USCL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $473 | $147 | $326 |
| 20 | $1,838 | $575 | $1,263 |
| 30 | $5,358 | $1,689 | $3,669 |
- 0.26%NULV
- 0.08%USCL, cheaper
- Middle half of US ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.25%
USCL cheapest of 47 funds
NULV 25th cheapest of 47 funds
NULV vs USCL Dividends
- NULV 1.35%, better
- USCL 1.06%
- NULV $0.74
- USCL $0.91
- NULV $0.74
- USCL $0.20
- NULV Dec 18, 2025
- USCL Sep 15, 2026
- NULV Dec 19, 2025
- USCL Sep 18, 2026
- NULV Annual
- USCL Quarterly
Distribution history
NULV vs USCL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NULV 12.5%USCL 12.5%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- NULV 1.25USCL 1.28, better
- Worst fall
- NULV −21.5%USCL −19.0%
- Market sensitivity
- NULV 0.82USCL 1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.26% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.