VCRM ranks 4th and NUMI 29th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
NUMI vs VCRM
VCRM −0.18pt a year
0.30%0.12%
VCRM 26.6×the volume
25.5K679K
NUMI vs VCRM Performance
+0.1%+1.1%
- NUMI 0.30%
- VCRM 0.12%, better
- NUMI $92M
- VCRM $2.2B
- NUMI +0.1%
- VCRM +1.1%, better
- NUMI 3.50%
- VCRM 3.81%, better
- NUMI 304
- VCRM 2588
- NUMI 25.5K sh
- VCRM 679K sh, better
- NUMI $24.33
- VCRM $73.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NUMI | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A81 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D39 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | C53 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | A79 | A81Higher |
| Durability | C40 | A74Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. NUMI and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NUMIB
VCRMA
In short
NUMI Nuveen underwrote its first municipal bond in 1898. NUMI packs that credit desk into an ETF: roughly 300 mostly investment-grade munis, tilted long, hunting undervalued yield, and paying tax-exempt income monthly for 0.30%.
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
NUMI The Fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in municipal securities whose interest is exempt from federal income taxes.
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NUMI vs VCRM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NUMI vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying NUMI vs VCRM
$3,629
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NUMI 0.30%
$6,149
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NUMI | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $220 | $325 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $859 | $1,254 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $2,520 | $3,629 |
- 0.30%NUMI
- 0.12%VCRM, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
NUMI 30th cheapest of 63 funds
NUMI vs VCRM Dividends
- NUMI 3.50%
- VCRM 3.81%, better
- NUMI $0.85
- VCRM $2.82
- NUMI $0.07
- VCRM $0.21
- NUMI Oct 1, 2026
- VCRM Oct 1, 2026
- NUMI Oct 2, 2026
- VCRM Oct 5, 2026
- NUMI Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
NUMI vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NUMI 6.5%VCRM 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- NUMI −0.31VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- NUMI −7.3%VCRM −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- NUMI 0.16VCRM 0.17
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.