USCL ranks 7th and NUMV 31st of 47 funds in the US ESG & Values Index Category.
NUMV vs USCL
USCL −0.23pt a year
0.31%0.08%
NUMV 1.9×the volume
25.6K13.1K
NUMV +0.6pt
+20.5%+19.9%
NUMV vs USCL Performance
+19.8%+9.6%
- NUMV 0.31%
- USCL 0.08%, better
- NUMV $426M
- USCL $2.61B
- NUMV +19.8%, better
- USCL +9.6%
- NUMV 1.31%, better
- USCL 1.06%
- NUMV 88
- USCL 393
- NUMV 25.6K sh, better
- USCL 13.1K sh
- NUMV $44.80
- USCL $83.10
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NUMV | USCL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D33 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A71 | |
| Risk | B67Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | C45 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | A71Higher | D34 |
| Durability | B67 | A71Higher |
Rank among US ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. NUMV and USCL are both graded against the same 47 US ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NUMVC
USCLA
In short
NUMV Most ESG funds are the S&P 500 with the worst offenders stripped out. NUMV works a narrower lane: US mid-cap value stocks, screened for ESG, controversial business involvement and carbon, in an index it has tracked since 2016.
USCL Most ESG index funds work by exclusion. USCL scores roughly 400 US large and mid caps on where they're heading instead: emissions intensity, reduction targets, green revenue. And it charges 0.08% a year to do it.
Stated mandate
NUMV The Fund seeks to track the performance of a U.S. mid-cap value index before fees and expenses. The index applies ESG criteria to its eligible equity securities.
USCL The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies selected for their relative positioning on the transition to a low-carbon economy, using climate-related measures such as emissions intensity, reduction targets, green-business revenue, and climate-risk management.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NUMV vs USCL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NUMV vs USCL Cost
Overpaying NUMV vs USCL
$4,657
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NUMV 0.31%
$6,346
USCL 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NUMV | USCL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $563 | $147 | $416 |
| 20 | $2,182 | $575 | $1,607 |
| 30 | $6,346 | $1,689 | $4,657 |
- 0.31%NUMV
- 0.08%USCL, cheaper
- Middle half of US ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.25%
USCL cheapest of 47 funds
NUMV 30th cheapest of 47 funds
NUMV vs USCL Dividends
- NUMV 1.31%, better
- USCL 1.06%
- NUMV $0.60
- USCL $0.91
- NUMV $0.60
- USCL $0.20
- NUMV Dec 18, 2025
- USCL Sep 15, 2026
- NUMV Dec 19, 2025
- USCL Sep 18, 2026
- NUMV Annual
- USCL Quarterly
Distribution history
NUMV vs USCL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NUMV 14.7%USCL 12.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- NUMV 1.07USCL 1.28, better
- Worst fall
- NUMV −25.6%USCL −19.0%
- Market sensitivity
- NUMV 0.96USCL 1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.31% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.31% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.31% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.