Skip to content

OCTJ vs PEPS

Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF

OCTJCCboe

Parametric Equity Plus ETF

PEPSBNasdaq

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PEPS −0.69pt a year

OCTJ0.79%PEPS0.10%

Avg volume · 30D

OCTJ 9.4×the volume

OCTJ3.43KPEPS364

OCTJ vs PEPS Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.2%OCTJ+11.7%PEPS

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. OCTJ +5.2%. PEPS +11.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
OCTJ 0.79%
PEPS 0.10%, better
Fund size
OCTJ $15M
PEPS $29M
1Y total return
OCTJ +5.2%
PEPS +11.7%, better
Yield (12M)
OCTJ 5.32%, better
PEPS 0.97%
Holdings
OCTJ 6
PEPS 203
Avg volume (30D)
OCTJ 3.43K sh, better
PEPS 364 sh
NAV per share
OCTJ $23.93
PEPS $32.59
52W range

ETF.net Grade

OCTJ: Cost 31, Risk 73, Mission 35, Tradability 44, Holdings not scored, Durability 46. PEPS: Cost 100, Risk 24, Mission not scored, Tradability 31, Holdings 74, Durability 39.
Pillar letters and Scores for OCTJ, PEPS, with each pillar’s weight
PillarOCTJPEPS
Cost30% weightD31A100Higher
Mission25% weightD35Not scored
Risk15% weightA73HigherF24
Tradability15% weightC44HigherD31
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA74
Durability5% weightC46HigherD39

Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. OCTJ and PEPS are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Option Income⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PEPS ranks 20th and OCTJ 38th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.

  1. Rank 20BISPYProShares S&P 500 High Income ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 20BPEPSParametric Equity Plus ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 20BXPAYRoundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETFScore 63
  4. Rank 37CXDTERoundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETFScore 43
  5. Rank 38COCTJInnovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETFScore 42
  6. Rank 39CAPRJInnovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETFScore 41

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

OCTJCInnovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF

PEPSBParametric Equity Plus ETF

In short

OCTJ Income you can pencil in: OCTJ sets a distribution rate at the start of each annual period, pays it quarterly, and cushions S&P 500 declines down to a 30% barrier. Defined-outcome plumbing pointed at cash flow instead of upside.

PEPS Active management at index-fund pricing. PEPS holds a U.S. large-cap base, then writes S&P 500 calls against offsetting long exposure: a beta-neutral overlay built to add return rather than swap upside for income.

Stated mandate

OCTJ The fund seeks a defined income outcome over each annual period, with returns tied to the S&P 500 Price Return Index and downside protection through a 30% barrier.

PEPS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed, using a U.S. large-cap equity base and beta-neutral call overwriting on the S&P 500 with offsetting long exposure to seek incremental total return.

Why people hold it

  • OCTJ The payout is defined up front: a distribution rate set at the start of each annual outcome period, then paid quarterly.
  • Downside protection is deep by defined-outcome standards: a 30% barrier against the S&P 500 Price Return Index across each annual period.
  • Terms reset every October. New outcome period, newly set rate, barrier back to full depth.
  • It arrives as a 1940 Act ETF, so the defined-income terms sit in an exchange-traded fund rather than a bank-issued structured note.
  • PEPS 0.10% is index-fund pricing for an actively managed strategy. Even the cheap, well-regarded active peers cost more: DFAU at 0.12%, FELC at 0.18%.
  • Not a covered-call fund. The sold S&P 500 calls are paired with offsetting long exposure, so the overlay seeks incremental total return instead of capping upside.
  • Ordinary 1940 Act ETF wrapper, U.S. large-cap equity, distributions paid quarterly. The complexity lives in the overlay, not the tax paperwork.
  • Cost is the standout: the typical active U.S. equity ETF in this group charges several times what PEPS does, and fee drag is the one input you know in advance.

Worth knowing

  • OCTJ A barrier is a cliff, not a buffer. It is measured at period end, so interim swings are uncushioned and a finish past 30% down removes the protection.
  • The 0.79% fee sits above the cohort median and well above index-built S&P 500 income peers like IVVW (0.25%) and RSPA (0.32%).
  • Small and thinly traded next to the giants of the premium-income shelf, so bid-ask spreads carry more weight at the point of trade.
  • PEPS Launched in November 2024. The overlay has not yet run through a full market cycle, so there is limited history to judge it on.
  • A small, thinly traded fund. Bid-ask spreads can run wider than a mega-cap index ETF's, which shows up most on larger orders.
  • The options leg adds moving parts: short index calls lose value in a sharp rally, and the offsetting long exposure is what has to make that back.

Full OCTJ profile⁠

Full PEPS profile⁠

OCTJ vs PEPS Holdings

How OCTJ and PEPS differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of OCTJ and 0.0% of PEPS.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile99.5%

Sector

No Sector split for PEPS.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in OCTJ and PEPS, widest gap first
CountryMore in OCTJMore in PEPS
United StatesOCTJ +0.2 points
ChinaPEPS +0.3 points
SwitzerlandOCTJ +0.2 points
BrazilPEPS +0.2 points
MexicoOCTJ +0.1 points
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight
FinlandSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • OCTJ129.9%
  • PEPS38.5%

Securities held

  • OCTJ6
  • PEPS202

Asset class

OCTJ
Equity
PEPS
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in OCTJ6
  • In both0
  • Only in PEPS202

Only in OCTJ

6 securities, 100% of OCTJ by weight

  • United States Treasury Bill 09/30/202798.16%
  • Spx 09/30/2027 5279.9 P27.39%
  • United States Treasury Bill 12/31/20261.47%

Only in PEPS

202 securities, 100% of PEPS by weight

  • Apple Inc Common Stock7.48%
  • NVIDIA Corp Common Stock6.80%
  • Microsoft Corp Common5.70%

Weight gaps

OCTJ and PEPS share no securities.

All 7 OCTJ holdings⁠All PEPS holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

OCTJ vs PEPS Cost

Overpaying OCTJ vs PEPS

$13,068

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • OCTJ 0.79%

    $15,174

  • PEPS 0.10%

    $2,106

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • OCTJ 0.79%
  • PEPS 0.10%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530OCTJ $15,174PEPS $2,106

Year by year

YearOCTJPEPSOverpaying
10$1,405$183$1,222
20$5,331$717$4,614
30$15,174$2,106$13,068

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%OCTJ
  • 0.10%PEPS, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
  • Median 0.60%

PEPS cheapest of 51 funds

OCTJ 33rd cheapest of 51 funds

OCTJ vs PEPS Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
OCTJ 5.32%, better
PEPS 0.97%
Payout (12M)
OCTJ $1.27
PEPS $0.32
Last payment
OCTJ $0.32
PEPS $0.09
Ex-dividend
OCTJ Sep 30, 2026
PEPS Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
OCTJ Oct 2, 2026
PEPS Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
OCTJ Quarterly
PEPS Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

OCTJQuarterly · 12 paymentsAll OCTJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 12 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2023 $0.40; Mar 27, 2024 $0.40; Jun 28, 2024 $0.40; Sep 30, 2024 $0.40; Dec 31, 2024 $0.31; Mar 31, 2025 $0.31; Jun 30, 2025 $0.31; Sep 30, 2025 $0.31; Dec 31, 2025 $0.32; Mar 31, 2026 $0.32; Jun 30, 2026 $0.32; Sep 30, 2026 $0.32. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
PEPSQuarterly · 8 paymentsAll PEPS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2024 $0.04; Mar 24, 2025 $0.07; Jun 23, 2025 $0.06; Sep 22, 2025 $0.07; Dec 23, 2025 $0.10; Mar 23, 2026 $0.06; Jun 22, 2026 $0.08; Sep 21, 2026 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

OCTJ vs PEPS Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
OCTJ 1.5%PEPS 12.9%since Dec 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
OCTJ 0.83PEPS 0.85since Dec 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
OCTJ −5.4%since Oct 2023PEPS −21.3%since Nov 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
OCTJ 0.13PEPS 1.02

Popular comparisons

  • OCTJCvsCSHIA

    Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF · Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PEPSBvsCSHIA

    Parametric Equity Plus ETF · Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • OCTJCvsBALIA

    Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF · iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PEPSBvsBALIA

    Parametric Equity Plus ETF · iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • OCTJCvsIVVWA

    Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF · iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PEPSBvsIVVWA

    Parametric Equity Plus ETF · iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.