ZALT ranks 1st and OCTT 10th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
OCTT vs ZALT
ZALT −0.05pt a year
0.74%0.69%
ZALT 5.0×the volume
27.7K138K
OCTT +5.0pt
+15.6%+10.6%
OCTT vs ZALT Performance
+12.0%+7.1%
- OCTT 0.74%
- ZALT 0.69%, better
- OCTT $121M
- ZALT $840M
- OCTT +12.0%, better
- ZALT +7.1%
- OCTT 2
- ZALT 503
- OCTT 27.7K sh
- ZALT 138K sh, better
- OCTT $48.85
- ZALT $34.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | OCTT | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | C45 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | A74Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | B55 | A90Higher |
| Durability | C54 | B61Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. OCTT and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
OCTTB
ZALTA
In short
OCTT A one-year seatbelt on the S&P 500, rebuckled every October 1. OCTT cushions the first 10% of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's price losses and trades away gains above a cap, with the options book run by Allianz Life's own investment arm.
ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.
Stated mandate
OCTT The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust’s share-price return at the end of each one-year Outcome Period, subject to an upside Cap and a buffer against the first 10% of losses.
ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
OCTT vs ZALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
OCTT vs ZALT Cost
Overpaying OCTT vs ZALT
$878
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
OCTT 0.74%
$14,307
ZALT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | OCTT | ZALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $1,232 | $87 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $4,697 | $318 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $13,429 | $878 |
- 0.74%OCTT
- 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds
OCTT 17th cheapest of 77 funds
OCTT vs ZALT Dividends
- OCTT None
- ZALT None
Distribution history
OCTT vs ZALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- OCTT 7.6%ZALT 3.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- OCTT 1.38ZALT 1.50, better
- Worst fall
- OCTT −13.5%ZALT −8.2%
- Market sensitivity
- OCTT 0.60ZALT 0.29
OCTT and ZALT in the news
Filings Digest
AllianzIM launches OCTI and resets October buffer terms

Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.