PSFD ranks 2nd and OCTW 8th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
OCTW vs PSFD
PSFD −0.25pt a year
0.74%0.49%
OCTW 63.1×the volume
57.1K905
PSFD +2.4pt
+8.9%+11.3%
OCTW vs PSFD Performance
+52.8%+70.8%
- OCTW 0.74%
- PSFD 0.49%, better
- OCTW $448M
- PSFD $60M
- OCTW +8.6%
- PSFD +11.4%, better
- OCTW 3
- PSFD 4
- OCTW 57.1K sh, better
- PSFD 905 sh
- OCTW $42.27
- PSFD $40.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | OCTW | PSFD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | A85Higher |
| Mission | B61 | |
| Risk | C47Higher | D30 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | B67 | |
| Durability | A80Higher | B69 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. OCTW and PSFD are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
OCTWC
PSFDB
In short
OCTW A 20% buffer against S&P 500 price losses over a 12-month stretch that resets every October 1, built by Allianz Life's investment arm. Deep-end downside protection, paid for with a cap and no dividends.
PSFD Absorbs the first 20% of a drop in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each 12-month period, with your upside capped in exchange. One of the original 2020 Pacer/Swan buffer funds, and priced under most deep-buffer rivals.
Stated mandate
OCTW The Fund seeks to match the S&P 500 Price Index over a complete one-year outcome period, subject to an upside cap, while buffering the first 20% of index losses.
PSFD The fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while mitigating specified downside losses through a structured buffer strategy over an approximately one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
OCTW vs PSFD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
OCTW vs PSFD Cost
Overpaying OCTW vs PSFD
$4,515
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
OCTW 0.74%
$14,307
PSFD 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | OCTW | PSFD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $883 | $436 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $3,394 | $1,621 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $9,792 | $4,515 |
- 0.74%OCTW
- 0.49%PSFD, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
PSFD cheapest of 24 funds
OCTW 10th cheapest of 24 funds
OCTW vs PSFD Dividends
- OCTW None
- PSFD None
Distribution history
OCTW vs PSFD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- OCTW
- PSFD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- OCTW 4.7%, betterPSFD 7.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- OCTW 1.28PSFD 1.50, better
- Worst fall
- OCTW −8.4%, betterPSFD −14.9%
- Market sensitivity
- OCTW 0.34PSFD 0.56
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

