PANG ranks 3rd and ONDU 302nd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
ONDU vs PANG
0.0%by weight
PANG −0.73pt a year
1.49%0.76%
PANG 1.5×the volume
30.6K44.6K
ONDU vs PANG Performance
−49.5%−1.5%
- ONDU 1.49%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- ONDU $2M
- PANG $9M
- ONDU
- PANG +76.3%
- ONDU 2
- PANG 4
- ONDU 30.6K sh
- PANG 44.6K sh, better
- ONDU $7.93
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ONDU | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A87 | A94Higher |
| Risk | D28 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | D26 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C46 | B59Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. ONDU and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ONDUF
PANGA
In short
ONDU Two times the daily move of Ondas Holdings, the drone and private-wireless small cap, in one ticker. Most single-stock leverage points at megacaps; this one takes aim at a name that already swings hard, then doubles it.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
ONDU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the daily performance of Ondas Holdings Inc. common shares.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ONDU vs PANG Holdings
How ONDU and PANG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of ONDU and 0.0% of PANG.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for ONDU and PANG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for ONDU.
Concentration
- ONDU112.2%
- PANG210.1%
- ONDU2
- PANG1
Asset class
- ONDU
- Leveraged/Inverse
- PANG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in ONDU2
- In both0
- Only in PANG1
Only in ONDU
2 securities, 100% of ONDU by weight
- Cashusd106.50%
- Cfd Ondas Inc5.66%
Only in PANG
1 security, 10.0% of PANG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204010.04%
Weight gaps
ONDU and PANG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ONDU vs PANG Cost
Overpaying ONDU vs PANG
$11,485
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ONDU 1.49%
$26,141
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ONDU | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,574 | $1,353 | $1,221 |
| 20 | $9,464 | $5,142 | $4,322 |
| 30 | $26,141 | $14,656 | $11,485 |
- 1.49%ONDU
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
ONDU 263rd cheapest of 315 funds
ONDU vs PANG Dividends
- ONDU None
- PANG
- ONDU
- PANG $1.30
- ONDU
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- ONDU
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- ONDU
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
ONDU vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ONDU PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- ONDU PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- ONDU PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- ONDU 4.92PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.49% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.