ONOF ranks 3rd and WIMA 5th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.
ONOF vs WIMA
ONOF −0.03pt a year
0.39%0.42%
ONOF 1.3×the volume
5.82K4.34K
ONOF vs WIMA Performance
+1.3%−1.9%
- ONOF 0.39%, better
- WIMA 0.42%
- ONOF $140M
- WIMA $79M
- ONOF +7.7%
- WIMA
- ONOF 1.22%
- WIMA
- ONOF 504
- WIMA 500
- ONOF 5.82K sh, better
- WIMA 4.34K sh
- ONOF $40.37
- WIMA $42.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ONOF | WIMA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | A89 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B62 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | B59Higher | F19 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | B69 |
| Durability | B56Higher | B55 |
Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
Same Category. ONOF and WIMA are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ONOFA
WIMAB
In short
ONOF The ticker says it out loud: ONOF is an on/off switch. Four technical indicators decide whether it owns a broad basket of U.S. stocks or sits in short-term Treasuries. Rules, not hunches.
WIMA Trend-following usually means US large caps. WIMA aims the same machinery at developed international stocks: hold equities while the 200-day trend holds, shift to US T-bills when it breaks, with a breadth check for getting back in.
Stated mandate
ONOF ONOF seeks to track the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index before fees and expenses. Its four technical indicators shift the Fund between U.S. equities and defensive short-term Treasuries.
WIMA The Fund passively seeks to follow, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ONOF vs WIMA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ONOF vs WIMA Cost
Overpaying WIMA vs ONOF
$574
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ONOF 0.39%
$7,898
WIMA 0.42%
$8,472
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ONOF | WIMA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $759 | $54 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $2,927 | $202 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $8,472 | $574 |
- 0.39%ONOF, cheaper
- 0.42%WIMA
- Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
- Median 0.67%
ONOF 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
WIMA 3rd cheapest of 20 funds
ONOF vs WIMA Dividends
- ONOF 1.22%
- WIMA
- ONOF $0.49
- WIMA
- ONOF $0.16
- WIMA $0.29
- ONOF Jun 29, 2026
- WIMA Sep 25, 2026
- ONOF Jul 2, 2026
- WIMA Sep 29, 2026
- ONOF Twice a year
- WIMA Quarterly
Distribution history
ONOF vs WIMA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ONOF 12.0%WIMA
- Return per unit of risk
- ONOF 0.82WIMA
- Worst fall
- ONOF −26.2%WIMA
- Market sensitivity
- ONOF 0.96WIMA 0.42
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.