ONOF ranks 3rd and TRND 14th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.
ONOF vs TRND
ONOF −0.38pt a year
0.39%0.77%
ONOF 1.8×the volume
5.82K3.26K
ONOF +2.3pt
+7.4%+5.1%
ONOF vs TRND Performance
+42.6%+28.2%
- ONOF 0.39%, better
- TRND 0.77%
- ONOF $140M
- TRND $61M
- ONOF +7.7%
- TRND +8.6%, better
- ONOF 1.22%
- TRND 2.15%, better
- ONOF 504
- TRND 7
- ONOF 5.82K sh, better
- TRND 3.26K sh
- ONOF $40.37
- TRND $36.08
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ONOF | TRND |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | D37 |
| Mission | C40 | |
| Risk | B62 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | B59Higher | F19 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | C45 |
| Durability | B56Higher | C48 |
Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
Same Category. ONOF and TRND are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ONOFA
TRNDC
In short
ONOF The ticker says it out loud: ONOF is an on/off switch. Four technical indicators decide whether it owns a broad basket of U.S. stocks or sits in short-term Treasuries. Rules, not hunches.
TRND The whole Trendpilot family in one ticker: instead of picking which sleeve goes on trend autopilot, TRND holds Pacer's own trend-following ETFs across US large cap, mid cap, international and bonds.
Stated mandate
ONOF ONOF seeks to track the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index before fees and expenses. Its four technical indicators shift the Fund between U.S. equities and defensive short-term Treasuries.
TRND The Fund seeks to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ONOF vs TRND Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ONOF vs TRND Cost
Overpaying TRND vs ONOF
$6,931
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ONOF 0.39%
$7,898
TRND 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ONOF | TRND | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,371 | $666 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $5,205 | $2,480 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $14,829 | $6,931 |
- 0.39%ONOF, cheaper
- 0.77%TRND
- Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
- Median 0.67%
ONOF 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
TRND 13th cheapest of 20 funds
ONOF vs TRND Dividends
- ONOF 1.22%
- TRND 2.15%, better
- ONOF $0.49
- TRND $0.78
- ONOF $0.16
- TRND $0.78
- ONOF Jun 29, 2026
- TRND Dec 31, 2025
- ONOF Jul 2, 2026
- TRND Jan 6, 2026
- ONOF Twice a year
- TRND Annual
Distribution history
ONOF vs TRND Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ONOF
- TRND
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ONOF 12.0%TRND 9.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ONOF 0.82, betterTRND 0.78
- Worst fall
- ONOF −26.2%TRND −16.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ONOF 0.96TRND 0.98
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.