UNHG ranks 2nd and OSCX 258th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
OSCX vs UNHG
UNHG −0.55pt a year
1.32%0.77%
UNHG 103.3×the volume
7.03K726K
OSCX vs UNHG Performance
+35.2%+11.9%
- OSCX 1.32%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- OSCX $7M
- UNHG $63M
- OSCX +35.2%, better
- UNHG +11.9%
- OSCX 8
- UNHG 5
- OSCX 7.03K sh
- UNHG 726K sh, better
- OSCX $31.54
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | OSCX | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D25 | B60Higher |
| Mission | A91Higher | A90 |
| Risk | B65 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | F23 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B62 | B66Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. OSCX and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
OSCXD
UNHGA
In short
OSCX The first 2X wrapper on Oscar Health: 200% of OSCR's daily move, reset every session, inside a plain brokerage account. The trade-offs are a 1.32% fee and one health insurtech stock carrying the entire position.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
OSCX The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Oscar Health, Inc.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
OSCX vs UNHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
OSCX vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying OSCX vs UNHG
$8,839
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
OSCX 1.32%
$23,668
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | OSCX | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,296 | $1,371 | $925 |
| 20 | $8,507 | $5,205 | $3,302 |
| 30 | $23,668 | $14,829 | $8,839 |
- 1.32%OSCX
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
OSCX 243rd cheapest of 315 funds
OSCX vs UNHG Dividends
- OSCX None
- UNHG
- OSCX
- UNHG $1.90
- OSCX
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- OSCX
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- OSCX
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
OSCX vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- OSCX 166.5%UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- OSCX 0.57UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- OSCX −84.5%UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- OSCX 2.67UNHG 5.53
Popular comparisons
- 1.32% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.