PANG ranks 3rd and OSCX 258th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
OSCX vs PANG
PANG −0.56pt a year
1.32%0.76%
PANG 6.3×the volume
7.03K44.6K
OSCX vs PANG Performance
+35.2%+91.6%
- OSCX 1.32%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- OSCX $7M
- PANG $9M
- OSCX +35.2%
- PANG +91.6%, better
- OSCX 8
- PANG 4
- OSCX 7.03K sh
- PANG 44.6K sh, better
- OSCX $31.54
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | OSCX | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D25 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A91 | A94Higher |
| Risk | B65 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | F23 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B62Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. OSCX and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
OSCXD
PANGA
In short
OSCX The first 2X wrapper on Oscar Health: 200% of OSCR's daily move, reset every session, inside a plain brokerage account. The trade-offs are a 1.32% fee and one health insurtech stock carrying the entire position.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
OSCX The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Oscar Health, Inc.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
OSCX vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
OSCX vs PANG Cost
Overpaying OSCX vs PANG
$9,012
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
OSCX 1.32%
$23,668
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | OSCX | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,296 | $1,353 | $943 |
| 20 | $8,507 | $5,142 | $3,365 |
| 30 | $23,668 | $14,656 | $9,012 |
- 1.32%OSCX
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
OSCX 243rd cheapest of 315 funds
OSCX vs PANG Dividends
- OSCX None
- PANG
- OSCX
- PANG $1.30
- OSCX
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- OSCX
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- OSCX
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
OSCX vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- OSCX 166.5%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- OSCX 0.57PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- OSCX −84.5%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- OSCX 2.67PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.32% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.