USCL ranks 8th and PABU 14th of 47 funds in the US ESG & Values Index Category.
PABU vs USCL
USCL −0.02pt a year
0.10%0.08%
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
13.1K13.1K
USCL +1.4pt
+18.7%+20.1%
PABU vs USCL Performance
+4.0%+6.7%
- PABU 0.10%
- USCL 0.08%, better
- PABU $2.41B
- USCL $2.77B
- PABU +4.0%
- USCL +6.7%, better
- PABU 0.97%
- USCL 1.07%, better
- PABU 89
- USCL 394
- PABU 13.1K sh
- USCL 13.1K sh
- PABU $76.96
- USCL $85.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PABU | USCL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A91 | |
| Risk | F24 | C52Higher |
| Tradability | B64 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | D26 | D35Higher |
| Durability | B69 | A70Higher |
Rank among US ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. PABU and USCL are both graded against the same 47 US ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PABUB
USCLA
In short
PABU A Paris climate mandate at plain index-fund pricing. PABU follows an MSCI benchmark that pushes US large and mid caps onto a decarbonization path, landing on roughly 90 stocks for 0.10% a year.
USCL Most ESG index funds work by exclusion. USCL scores roughly 400 US large and mid caps on where they're heading instead: emissions intensity, reduction targets, green revenue. And it charges 0.08% a year to do it.
Stated mandate
PABU The fund tracks the MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select Index, which is composed of U.S. large- and mid-capitalization stocks selected and weighted to follow a decarbonization trajectory, reduce climate-related transition and physical risks, and increase exposure to companies positioned for the low-carbon transition.
USCL The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies selected for their relative positioning on the transition to a low-carbon economy, using climate-related measures such as emissions intensity, reduction targets, green-business revenue, and climate-risk management.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PABU vs USCL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PABU vs USCL Cost
Overpaying PABU vs USCL
$417
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PABU 0.10%
$2,106
USCL 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PABU | USCL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $147 | $36 |
| 20 | $717 | $575 | $142 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $1,689 | $417 |
- 0.10%PABU
- 0.08%USCL, cheaper
- Middle half of US ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.25%
USCL cheapest of 47 funds
PABU 7th cheapest of 47 funds
PABU vs USCL Dividends
- PABU 0.97%
- USCL 1.07%, better
- PABU $0.74
- USCL $0.91
- PABU $0.19
- USCL $0.20
- PABU Sep 15, 2026
- USCL Sep 15, 2026
- PABU Sep 18, 2026
- USCL Sep 18, 2026
- PABU Quarterly
- USCL Quarterly
Distribution history
PABU vs USCL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PABU 14.4%USCL 12.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PABU 1.05USCL 1.28, better
- Worst fall
- PABU −20.8%USCL −19.0%
- Market sensitivity
- PABU 1.04USCL 1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.