PANG ranks 3rd and PUL 255th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
PANG vs PUL
PANG −0.74pt a year
0.76%1.50%
PANG 12.2×the volume
44.6K3.66K
PANG vs PUL Performance
−1.5%+81.9%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- PUL 1.50%
- PANG $9M
- PUL $2M
- PANG +76.3%
- PUL
- PANG 4
- PUL 2
- PANG 44.6K sh, better
- PUL 3.66K sh
- PANG $31.31
- PUL $54.39
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PANG | PUL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | F11 |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | A74 | A82Higher |
| Tradability | A74Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B59Higher | D39 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. PANG and PUL are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PANGA
PULD
In short
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PANG vs PUL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PANG vs PUL Cost
Overpaying PUL vs PANG
$11,627
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
PUL 1.50%
$26,283
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PANG | PUL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,353 | $2,590 | $1,237 |
| 20 | $5,142 | $9,519 | $4,377 |
| 30 | $14,656 | $26,283 | $11,627 |
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- 1.50%PUL
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
PUL 271st cheapest of 315 funds
PANG vs PUL Dividends
- PANG
- PUL None
- PANG $1.30
- PUL
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- PUL
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- PUL
- PANG Irregular
- PUL
Distribution history
PANG vs PUL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PANG 128.2%PUL
- Return per unit of risk
- PANG 0.90PUL
- Worst fall
- PANG −62.4%PUL
- Market sensitivity
- PANG 3.32PUL 4.08
PANG and PUL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
