PANG ranks 3rd and PUR 111th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
PANG vs PUR
PANG −0.55pt a year
0.76%1.31%
PUR 2.6×the volume
44.6K117K
PANG vs PUR Performance
+7.0%+111.0%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- PUR 1.31%
- PANG $9M
- PUR $6M
- PANG +91.6%
- PUR
- PANG 4
- PUR 7
- PANG 44.6K sh
- PUR 117K sh, better
- PANG $31.31
- PUR $22.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PANG | PUR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | D25 |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | A74Higher | B66 |
| Tradability | A74Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B59Higher | C45 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. PANG and PUR are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PANGA
PURC
In short
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PANG vs PUR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PANG vs PUR Cost
Overpaying PUR vs PANG
$8,863
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
PUR 1.31%
$23,519
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PANG | PUR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,353 | $2,280 | $927 |
| 20 | $5,142 | $8,450 | $3,308 |
| 30 | $14,656 | $23,519 | $8,863 |
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- 1.31%PUR
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
PUR 236th cheapest of 315 funds
PANG vs PUR Dividends
- PANG
- PUR None
- PANG $1.30
- PUR
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- PUR
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- PUR
- PANG Irregular
- PUR
Distribution history
PANG vs PUR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PANG 128.2%PUR
- Return per unit of risk
- PANG 0.90PUR
- Worst fall
- PANG −62.4%PUR
- Market sensitivity
- PANG 3.32PUR 0.00
Popular comparisons
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.