PANG ranks 3rd and QUA 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
PANG vs QUA
QUA −0.31pt a year
0.76%0.45%
PANG 77.6×the volume
44.6K575
PANG vs QUA Performance
+7.0%−71.0%
- PANG 0.76%
- QUA 0.45%, better
- PANG $9M
- QUA $0
- PANG +91.6%
- QUA
- PANG 4
- QUA 1
- PANG 44.6K sh, better
- QUA 575 sh
- PANG $31.31
- QUA $4.92
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PANG | QUA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A88Higher |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | A74Higher | D32 |
| Tradability | A74Higher | F11 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B59Higher | F14 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. PANG and QUA are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PANGA
QUAC
In short
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PANG vs QUA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PANG vs QUA Cost
Overpaying PANG vs QUA
$5,615
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
QUA 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PANG | QUA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,353 | $812 | $541 |
| 20 | $5,142 | $3,128 | $2,014 |
| 30 | $14,656 | $9,041 | $5,615 |
- 0.76%PANG
- 0.45%QUA, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
QUA 7th cheapest of 315 funds
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
PANG vs QUA Dividends
- PANG
- QUA None
- PANG $1.30
- QUA
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- QUA
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- QUA
- PANG Irregular
- QUA
Distribution history
PANG vs QUA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PANG 128.2%QUA
- Return per unit of risk
- PANG 0.90QUA
- Worst fall
- PANG −62.4%QUA
- Market sensitivity
- PANG 3.32QUA 0.00
Popular comparisons
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.