PANG ranks 3rd and RAML 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
PANG vs RAML
PANG −0.23pt a year
0.76%0.99%
PANG 1.2×the volume
44.6K38.6K
PANG vs RAML Performance
+7.0%−21.0%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- RAML 0.99%
- PANG $9M
- RAML $2M
- PANG +91.6%
- RAML
- PANG 4
- RAML 4
- PANG 44.6K sh, better
- RAML 38.6K sh
- PANG $31.31
- RAML $8.52
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PANG | RAML |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | C48 |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | A74Higher | B62 |
| Tradability | A74Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B59Higher | D30 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. PANG and RAML are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PANGA
RAMLC
In short
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PANG vs RAML Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PANG vs RAML Cost
Overpaying RAML vs PANG
$3,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
RAML 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PANG | RAML | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,353 | $1,746 | $393 |
| 20 | $5,142 | $6,565 | $1,423 |
| 30 | $14,656 | $18,525 | $3,869 |
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- 0.99%RAML
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
RAML 169th cheapest of 315 funds
PANG vs RAML Dividends
- PANG
- RAML None
- PANG $1.30
- RAML
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- RAML
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- RAML
- PANG Irregular
- RAML
Distribution history
PANG vs RAML Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PANG 128.2%RAML
- Return per unit of risk
- PANG 0.90RAML
- Worst fall
- PANG −62.4%RAML
- Market sensitivity
- PANG 3.32RAML 0.00
PANG and RAML in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

