PANG ranks 3rd and SMCX 89th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
PANG vs SMCX
PANG −0.56pt a year
0.76%1.32%
SMCX 133.1×the volume
44.6K5.94M
PANG vs SMCX Performance
+91.6%−57.8%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- SMCX 1.32%
- PANG $9M
- SMCX $139M
- PANG +91.6%, better
- SMCX −57.8%
- PANG 4
- SMCX 11
- PANG 44.6K sh
- SMCX 5.94M sh, better
- PANG $31.31
- SMCX $8.19
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PANG | SMCX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | D25 |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | A74Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | A74 | A92Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B59 | A82Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. PANG and SMCX are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PANGA
SMCXC
In short
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
SMCX Two times Super Micro's daily move, bought like any stock. The leverage resets every night, which makes SMCX a trading tool rather than a hold-and-forget position, and it carries a 1.32% expense ratio.
Stated mandate
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
SMCX The fund seeks daily leveraged investment results equal to 200% of the daily percentage change in Super Micro Computer, Inc.'s share price.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PANG vs SMCX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PANG vs SMCX Cost
Overpaying SMCX vs PANG
$9,012
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
SMCX 1.32%
$23,668
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PANG | SMCX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,353 | $2,296 | $943 |
| 20 | $5,142 | $8,507 | $3,365 |
| 30 | $14,656 | $23,668 | $9,012 |
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- 1.32%SMCX
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
SMCX 243rd cheapest of 315 funds
PANG vs SMCX Dividends
- PANG $1.30
- SMCX $1.00
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- SMCX Dec 30, 2025
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- SMCX Dec 31, 2025
- PANG Irregular
- SMCX Irregular
Distribution history
PANG vs SMCX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PANG 128.2%SMCX 174.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- PANG 0.90SMCX 0.20
- Worst fall
- PANG −62.4%SMCX −96.8%
- Market sensitivity
- PANG 3.32SMCX 7.80
Popular comparisons
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.