PANG ranks 3rd and TTDU 295th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
PANG vs TTDU
PANG −0.74pt a year
0.76%1.50%
TTDU 3.3×the volume
44.6K149K
PANG vs TTDU Performance
+91.6%−96.7%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- TTDU 1.50%
- PANG $9M
- TTDU $11M
- PANG +91.6%, better
- TTDU −96.7%
- PANG 4
- TTDU 2
- PANG 44.6K sh
- TTDU 149K sh, better
- PANG $31.31
- TTDU $11.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PANG | TTDU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | F11 |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | A74Higher | F23 |
| Tradability | A74Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B59 | B61Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. PANG and TTDU are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PANGA
TTDUD
In short
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PANG vs TTDU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PANG vs TTDU Cost
Overpaying TTDU vs PANG
$11,627
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
TTDU 1.50%
$26,283
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PANG | TTDU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,353 | $2,590 | $1,237 |
| 20 | $5,142 | $9,519 | $4,377 |
| 30 | $14,656 | $26,283 | $11,627 |
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- 1.50%TTDU
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
TTDU 271st cheapest of 315 funds
PANG vs TTDU Dividends
- PANG
- TTDU None
- PANG $1.30
- TTDU
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- TTDU
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- TTDU
- PANG Irregular
- TTDU
Distribution history
PANG vs TTDU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PANG 128.2%TTDU 63.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- PANG 0.90TTDU −4.06
- Worst fall
- PANG −62.4%TTDU −97.3%
- Market sensitivity
- PANG 3.32TTDU 1.44
Popular comparisons
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.