PANG ranks 3rd and UBRL 76th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
PANG vs UBRL
0.0%by weight
PANG −0.42pt a year
0.76%1.18%
UBRL 4.8×the volume
44.6K215K
PANG vs UBRL Performance
+76.3%−61.0%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- UBRL 1.18%
- PANG $9M
- UBRL $28M
- PANG +76.3%, better
- UBRL −61.0%
- PANG 4
- UBRL 2
- PANG 44.6K sh
- UBRL 215K sh, better
- PANG $31.31
- UBRL $11.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PANG | UBRL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | D37 |
| Mission | A94Higher | A87 |
| Risk | A74Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | A74 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B59 | A77Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. PANG and UBRL are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PANGA
UBRLC
In short
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
UBRL Two times Uber's daily move, in one ticker. GraniteShares points a swap at a single ride-hailing and delivery stock and resets the leverage every day, at 1.15% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026. Built as a trading tool, per its own factsheet.
Stated mandate
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
UBRL The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to two times the daily percentage change in Uber Technologies Corporation's common stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PANG vs UBRL Holdings
How PANG and UBRL differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of PANG and 0.0% of UBRL.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for PANG and UBRL.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in PANGMore in UBRL | PANG | UBRL |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- PANG210.1%
- UBRL100.0%
- PANG1
- UBRL1
Asset class
- PANG
- Equity
- UBRL
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in PANG1
- In both0
- Only in UBRL1
Only in PANG
1 security, 10.0% of PANG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204010.04%
Only in UBRL
1 security, 66.6% of UBRL by weight
- Uber66.64%
Weight gaps
PANG and UBRL share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PANG vs UBRL Cost
Overpaying UBRL vs PANG
$6,887
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
UBRL 1.18%
$21,543
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PANG | UBRL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,353 | $2,065 | $712 |
| 20 | $5,142 | $7,697 | $2,555 |
| 30 | $14,656 | $21,543 | $6,887 |
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- 1.18%UBRL
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
UBRL 224th cheapest of 315 funds
PANG vs UBRL Dividends
- PANG $1.30
- UBRL $2.22
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- UBRL Dec 29, 2025
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- UBRL Dec 31, 2025
- PANG Irregular
- UBRL Irregular
Distribution history
PANG vs UBRL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PANG 128.2%UBRL 50.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- PANG 0.90UBRL −0.54
- Worst fall
- PANG −62.4%UBRL −65.6%
- Market sensitivity
- PANG 3.32UBRL 1.48
Popular comparisons
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.