Skip to content
etf.net

PANG vs XPEG

Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF

PANGANasdaq

Leverage Shares 2x Long XPEV Daily ETF

XPEGCNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

XPEG −0.01pt a year

PANG0.76%XPEG0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

XPEG 1.2×the volume

PANG44.6KXPEG52.7K

PANG vs XPEG Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+7.0%PANG−56.1%XPEG

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. PANG +7.0%. XPEG −56.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−20%20%40%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PANG 0.76%
XPEG 0.75%, better
Fund size
PANG $9M
XPEG $1M
1Y total return
PANG +91.6%
XPEG No data
Holdings
PANG 4
XPEG 4
Avg volume (30D)
PANG 44.6K sh
XPEG 52.7K sh, better
NAV per share
PANG $31.31
XPEG $2.16
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PANG: Cost 70, Risk 74, Mission 94, Tradability 74, Holdings not scored, Durability 59. XPEG: Cost 70, Risk 34, Mission 93, Tradability 43, Holdings not scored, Durability 41.
Pillar letters and Scores for PANG, XPEG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPANGXPEG
Cost30% weightA70A70
Mission25% weightA94HigherA93
Risk15% weightA74HigherD34
Tradability15% weightA74HigherC43
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB59HigherC41

Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PANG and XPEG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Long Leveraged⁠

Category · 315 funds
See all 315 ›

PANG ranks 3rd and XPEG 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.

  1. Rank 1ATSMGLeverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETFScore 73
  2. Rank 2AUNHGLeverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETFScore 72
  3. Rank 3AOKTGLeverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 3APANGLeverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETFScore 70
  5. Rank 5BAMDGLeverage Shares 2x Long AMD Daily ETFScore 69
  6. Rank 123CXAGICorgi AGIX 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 123CXPEGLeverage Shares 2x Long XPEV Daily ETFScore 40
  8. Rank 123CXYZGLeverage Shares 2x Long XYZ Daily ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PANGALeverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF

XPEGCLeverage Shares 2x Long XPEV Daily ETF

In short

PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.

XPEG Two times XPeng's daily move, in one US-listed ticker. XPEG uses swaps on the EV maker's ADR to double each day's swing (both directions), resets every night, and charges 0.75%.

Stated mandate

PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.

XPEG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of XPeng Inc. stock, before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • PANG Cheaper of the two 2x PANW funds: 0.76% flat versus 1.08% for PALU, and PALU's number is net of a waiver through September 1, 2027 (1.48% gross).direxion.com
  • That 0.76% also sits below the typical fee in the single-stock leveraged category, where costs usually run higher.
  • Hits its 200% daily target closely, one of the tighter implementations among hundreds of single-stock leveraged funds.
  • Leverage arrives inside a standard 1940 Act ETF: no margin agreement, no borrowing, no overnight position to roll yourself.leverageshares.com
  • XPEG Fee of 0.75%, below the typical 2x single-stock fund and below Direxion's 2x names such as AAPU and GGLL.
  • Plain mechanics: swaps plus the XPEV ADR target 200% of the stock's daily move, and the fund has stayed very close to that daily target.sec.gov
  • A 1940 Act fund, so you get geared XPeng exposure without a margin account or an options chain, and you cannot lose more than you put in.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • PANG Daily reset, not a 2x hold. Over weeks the returns compound, and a choppy stretch in PANW can leave the result far from double the move.leverageshares.com
  • One stock, twice the swing. An earnings miss or a cyber headline lands here with double the force, up or down.leverageshares.com
  • Smaller and more lightly traded than the giants of the category, so spreads can widen; limit orders earn their keep.
  • XPEG Leverage resets daily. Hold longer than a day and results can drift far from 2x the stock's move, especially through choppy, back-and-forth stretches.sec.gov
  • Small fund, thin trading. Spreads can widen, and the 2026 launch means a short track record to judge it by.
  • One Chinese EV maker's ADR is the whole portfolio, and the fund has paid no distributions.sec.gov

Full PANG profile⁠

Full XPEG profile⁠

PANG vs XPEG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PANG vs XPEG Cost

Overpaying PANG vs XPEG

$174

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PANG 0.76%

    $14,656

  • XPEG 0.75%

    $14,482

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PANG 0.76%
  • XPEG 0.75%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530PANG $14,656XPEG $14,482

Year by year

YearPANGXPEGOverpaying
10$1,353$1,336$17
20$5,142$5,078$64
30$14,656$14,482$174

Expense ratio

  • 0.76%PANG
  • 0.75%XPEG, cheaper
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
  • Median 0.97%

XPEG 87th cheapest of 315 funds

PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds

PANG vs XPEG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
PANG No data
XPEG None
Last payment
PANG $1.30
XPEG No data
Ex-dividend
PANG Dec 30, 2025
XPEG No data
Paid on
PANG Jan 2, 2026
XPEG No data
Frequency
PANG Irregular
XPEG No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

PANGIrregular · 1 paymentAll PANG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $1.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12026YTD
XPEGAll XPEG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PANG vs XPEG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PANG 128.2%since Apr 2025XPEG No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PANG 0.90since Apr 2025XPEG No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PANG −62.4%since Mar 2025XPEG No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PANG 3.32XPEG 0.50

Popular comparisons

  • PANGAvsTSMGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XPEGCvsTSMGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long XPEV Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PANGAvsUNHGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XPEGCvsUNHGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long XPEV Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PANGAvsOKTGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XPEGCvsOKTGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long XPEV Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.