Skip to content

PAPR vs PSMO

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

PAPRCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

PSMOBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PSMO −0.30pt a year

PAPR0.79%PSMO0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PAPR 4.5×the volume

PAPR32.8KPSMO7.3K

5Y return · a year

PSMO +1.5pt

PAPR+8.2%PSMO+9.7%

PAPR vs PSMO Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+48.1%PAPR+58.6%PSMO

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. PAPR +48.1%. PSMO +58.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%40%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
PAPR 0.79%
PSMO 0.49%, better
Fund size
PAPR $959M
PSMO $116M
1Y total return
PAPR +11.9%, better
PSMO +9.7%
Yield (12M)
PAPR 0.00%
PSMO No data
Holdings
PAPR 3
PSMO 3
Avg volume (30D)
PAPR 32.8K sh, better
PSMO 7.3K sh
NAV per share
PAPR $43.21
PSMO $33.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PAPR: Cost 35, Risk 63, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings not scored, Durability 83. PSMO: Cost 70, Risk 54, Mission 95, Tradability 65, Holdings not scored, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for PAPR, PSMO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPAPRPSMO
Cost30% weightD35A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightB63HigherC54
Tradability15% weightB59B65Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA83HigherB66

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PAPR and PSMO are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMO ranks 1st and PAPR 11th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 9CPJANInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 51
  4. Rank 11CPAPRInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 50
  5. Rank 11CTENMiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETFScore 50

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PAPRCInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

PSMOBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

In short

PAPR Innovator's April door. PAPR takes the first 15% of losses on the S&P 500 fund it references and caps your upside in exchange. The buffer resets every April 1, so the deal is rewritten once a year. Running since 2019.

PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.

Stated mandate

PAPR The Fund uses a defined-outcome strategy tied to SPY over the April 1, 2026–March 31, 2027 Outcome Period, seeking to limit upside at a cap while protecting the first 15% of underlying losses before fees and expenses.

PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • PAPR Buffers the first 15% of the reference fund's losses over each April-to-March outcome period, before fees and expenses. Downside cushion without leaving equities.innovatoretfs.com
  • One of twelve monthly Power Buffer siblings, so you can enter in April or ladder across start months instead of hanging everything on one reset date.
  • Live since April 2019, it has reset through real drawdowns rather than backtests, and it grades out in the upper tier of a crowded buffer peer group.
  • PSMO Charges 0.49% a year versus a 0.79% median across its 15%-buffer peer group, one of the lower-cost ways to own this structure.
  • Pacer's moderate SOS funds (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ) all price at 0.49%, while the Innovator power-buffer lineup (POCT, PJUL, PJAN) runs 0.79%.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, not an abstract index, so what's being buffered is a fund you can watch tick by tick.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • PAPR The cap is what pays for the buffer. Upside for each period is limited, and the 15% cushion is measured before the 0.79% fee, so a hot market year leaves gains on the table.
  • Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever cap and remaining buffer are left, not the headline terms. The full stated deal belongs to holders from the April 1 start.
  • At 0.79% it is priced like its Power Buffer siblings, while the laddered BUFF spreads the same style of outcomes across all twelve months for 0.10%.
  • PSMO Buffer and cap are engineered for the full one-year outcome period running October through September. Buy or sell mid-period and you may get neither in full.paceretfs.com
  • Upside stops at a cap reset each October. A runaway rally in the S&P 500 is the scenario this structure hands back in exchange for the 15% cushion.paceretfs.com
  • One of the quieter tickers in the buffer aisle, so spreads and order type matter more here than with the category's household names.

Full PAPR profile⁠

Full PSMO profile⁠

PAPR vs PSMO Holdings

How PAPR and PSMO differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of PAPR and 0.0% of PSMO.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors97.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in PAPR and PSMO, widest gap first
SectorMore in PAPRMore in PSMO
Consumer DiscretionaryPSMO +1.2 points
TechnologyPAPR +1.0 points
Health CarePAPR +1.1 points
CommunicationPSMO +0.7 points
EnergyPAPR +0.3 points
FinancialsPAPR +0.2 points
UtilitiesPSMO +0.2 points
IndustrialsPSMO +0.2 points
Consumer StaplesPSMO +0.1 points
Real EstatePSMO +0.1 points
MaterialsPSMO +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in PAPR and PSMO, widest gap first
CountryMore in PAPRMore in PSMO
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • PAPR107.5%
  • PSMO105.5%

Securities held

  • PAPR3
  • PSMO2

Asset class

PAPR
Equity
PSMO
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in PAPR3
  • In both0
  • Only in PSMO2

Only in PAPR

3 securities, 100% of PAPR by weight

  • Spy 03/31/2027 6.5 C105.89%
  • Spy 03/31/2027 650.34 P1.29%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.28%

Only in PSMO

2 securities, 100% of PSMO by weight

  • Spy 09/30/2027 8.47 C97.65%
  • Spy 09/30/2027 762.71 P5.36%

Weight gaps

PAPR and PSMO share no securities.

All 6 PAPR holdings⁠All 6 PSMO holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PAPR vs PSMO Cost

Overpaying PAPR vs PSMO

$5,382

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PAPR 0.79%

    $15,174

  • PSMO 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PAPR 0.79%
  • PSMO 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530PAPR $15,174PSMO $9,792

Year by year

YearPAPRPSMOOverpaying
10$1,405$883$522
20$5,331$3,394$1,937
30$15,174$9,792$5,382

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%PAPR
  • 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds

PAPR 24th cheapest of 51 funds

PAPR vs PSMO Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
PAPR 0.00%
PSMO No data
Payout (12M)
PAPR None
PSMO None

Distribution history

Per share, 2019, same scale for both

PAPR1 paymentAll PAPR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2019. Nov 19, 2019 $0.80. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502019
PSMOAll PSMO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PAPR vs PSMO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • PAPR
  • PSMO
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: PAPR −11.9% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−7.5%−5%−2.5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PAPR 5.9%PSMO 5.9%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PAPR 1.31PSMO 1.31Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PAPR −11.9%PSMO −9.8%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PAPR 0.45PSMO 0.41

Popular comparisons

  • PAPRCvsPSMJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsPSMJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PAPRCvsPSMRB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PAPRCvsBUFCB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.