PEPS ranks 20th and PHDG 29th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
PEPS vs PHDG
PEPS −0.29pt a year
0.10%0.39%
PHDG 19.9×the volume
3647.25K
PEPS vs PHDG Performance
+11.7%+8.7%
- PEPS 0.10%, better
- PHDG 0.39%
- PEPS $29M
- PHDG $62M
- PEPS +11.7%, better
- PHDG +8.7%
- PEPS 0.97%
- PHDG 1.44%, better
- PEPS 203
- PHDG 508
- PEPS 364 sh
- PHDG 7.25K sh, better
- PEPS $32.59
- PHDG $41.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PEPS | PHDG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A73 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F24 | D39Higher |
| Tradability | D31Higher | D30 |
| Holdings | A74Higher | A70 |
| Durability | D39 | B66Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. PEPS and PHDG are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PEPSB
PHDGB
In short
PEPS Active management at index-fund pricing. PEPS holds a U.S. large-cap base, then writes S&P 500 calls against offsetting long exposure: a beta-neutral overlay built to add return rather than swap upside for income.
PHDG Most funds in this corner of the market sell options for income. PHDG does the opposite: an S&P 500 core paired with a VIX futures hedge that scales up as markets get choppy, run actively since 2012.
Stated mandate
PEPS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed, using a U.S. large-cap equity base and beta-neutral call overwriting on the S&P 500 with offsetting long exposure to seek incremental total return.
PHDG The actively managed ETF seeks positive total returns in rising or falling markets. It obtains dynamic exposure to S&P 500 equity and volatility.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PEPS vs PHDG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PEPS vs PHDG Cost
Overpaying PHDG vs PEPS
$5,792
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PEPS 0.10%
$2,106
PHDG 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PEPS | PHDG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $705 | $522 |
| 20 | $717 | $2,725 | $2,008 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $7,898 | $5,792 |
- 0.10%PEPS, cheaper
- 0.39%PHDG
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
PEPS cheapest of 51 funds
PHDG 14th cheapest of 51 funds
PEPS vs PHDG Dividends
- PEPS 0.97%
- PHDG 1.44%, better
- PEPS $0.32
- PHDG $0.59
- PEPS $0.09
- PHDG $0.12
- PEPS Sep 21, 2026
- PHDG Sep 21, 2026
- PEPS Sep 25, 2026
- PHDG Sep 25, 2026
- PEPS Quarterly
- PHDG Quarterly
Distribution history
PEPS vs PHDG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PEPS 12.9%PHDG 10.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- PEPS 0.85PHDG 0.65
- Worst fall
- PEPS −21.3%PHDG −17.1%
- Market sensitivity
- PEPS 1.02PHDG 0.71
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.