PEPS ranks 21st and SIXH 32nd of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
PEPS vs SIXH
PEPS −0.59pt a year
0.10%0.69%
SIXH 37.2×the volume
41715.5K
PEPS vs SIXH Performance
+13.2%+20.9%
- PEPS 0.10%, better
- SIXH 0.69%
- PEPS $28M
- SIXH $621M
- PEPS +13.2%
- SIXH +20.9%, better
- PEPS 0.98%
- SIXH 1.76%, better
- PEPS 192
- SIXH 49
- PEPS 417 sh
- SIXH 15.5K sh, better
- PEPS $31.53
- SIXH $44.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PEPS | SIXH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | C42 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D25 | A78Higher |
| Tradability | D33 | D34Higher |
| Holdings | A71Higher | B63 |
| Durability | D39 | B67Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. PEPS and SIXH are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PEPSB
SIXHC
In short
PEPS Active management at index-fund pricing. PEPS holds a U.S. large-cap base, then writes S&P 500 calls against offsetting long exposure: a beta-neutral overlay built to add return rather than swap upside for income.
SIXH Most hedged-equity funds bolt options onto an index. SIXH runs a concentrated book of about 50 growth-and-quality stocks, then writes calls on broad equity indexes over the top. Active on both sides, and it pays monthly.
Stated mandate
PEPS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed, using a U.S. large-cap equity base and beta-neutral call overwriting on the S&P 500 with offsetting long exposure to seek incremental total return.
SIXH The Fund seeks capital appreciation. Its active strategy combines an equity portfolio with call-option writing on broad equity-market indices or funds, intended to reduce broad equity-market exposure.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PEPS vs SIXH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PEPS vs SIXH Cost
Overpaying SIXH vs PEPS
$11,323
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PEPS 0.10%
$2,106
SIXH 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PEPS | SIXH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $1,232 | $1,049 |
| 20 | $717 | $4,697 | $3,980 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $13,429 | $11,323 |
- 0.10%PEPS, cheaper
- 0.69%SIXH
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
PEPS cheapest of 51 funds
SIXH 30th cheapest of 51 funds
PEPS vs SIXH Dividends
- PEPS 0.98%
- SIXH 1.76%, better
- PEPS $0.32
- SIXH $0.79
- PEPS $0.09
- SIXH $0.12
- PEPS Sep 21, 2026
- SIXH Oct 28, 2026
- PEPS Sep 25, 2026
- SIXH Oct 30, 2026
- PEPS Quarterly
- SIXH Monthly
Distribution history
PEPS vs SIXH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PEPS 12.9%SIXH 7.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- PEPS 0.85SIXH 1.36
- Worst fall
- PEPS −21.3%SIXH −11.7%
- Market sensitivity
- PEPS 1.02SIXH 0.09
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.