Skip to content

PEPS vs SPYC

Parametric Equity Plus ETF

PEPSBNasdaq

Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF

SPYCCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

PEPS −0.43pt a year

PEPS0.10%SPYC0.53%

Avg volume · 30D

SPYC 49.6×the volume

PEPS364SPYC18.1K

PEPS vs SPYC Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.7%PEPS+1.9%SPYC

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. PEPS +11.7%. SPYC +1.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%5%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PEPS 0.10%, better
SPYC 0.53%
Fund size
PEPS $29M
SPYC $69M
1Y total return
PEPS +11.7%, better
SPYC +1.9%
Yield (12M)
PEPS 0.97%
SPYC 1.13%, better
Holdings
PEPS 203
SPYC 22
Avg volume (30D)
PEPS 364 sh
SPYC 18.1K sh, better
NAV per share
PEPS $32.59
SPYC $44.27
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PEPS: Cost 100, Risk 24, Mission not scored, Tradability 31, Holdings 74, Durability 39. SPYC: Cost 60, Risk 12, Mission 29, Tradability 53, Holdings 44, Durability 48.
Pillar letters and Scores for PEPS, SPYC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPEPSSPYC
Cost30% weightA100HigherB60
Mission25% weightNot scoredD29
Risk15% weightF24HigherF12
Tradability15% weightD31C53Higher
Holdings10% weightA74HigherC44
Durability5% weightD39C48Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PEPS and SPYC are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Option Income⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PEPS ranks 20th and SPYC 39th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.

  1. Rank 20BISPYProShares S&P 500 High Income ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 20BPEPSParametric Equity Plus ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 20BXPAYRoundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETFScore 63
  4. Rank 39CAPRJInnovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETFScore 41
  5. Rank 39CSPYCSimplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETFScore 41
  6. Rank 39CXISEFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - SeptemberScore 41

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PEPSBParametric Equity Plus ETF

SPYCCSimplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF

In short

PEPS Active management at index-fund pricing. PEPS holds a U.S. large-cap base, then writes S&P 500 calls against offsetting long exposure: a beta-neutral overlay built to add return rather than swap upside for income.

SPYC Most funds in its peer group sell S&P 500 calls to harvest premium. SPYC does the opposite: a plain index core plus a small options budget built to pay off when the market makes an extreme move, up or down.

Stated mandate

PEPS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed, using a U.S. large-cap equity base and beta-neutral call overwriting on the S&P 500 with offsetting long exposure to seek incremental total return.

SPYC The fund seeks capital appreciation through U.S. large-cap exposure and a systematic options overlay designed to boost performance during extreme market moves in either direction.

Why people hold it

  • PEPS 0.10% is index-fund pricing for an actively managed strategy. Even the cheap, well-regarded active peers cost more: DFAU at 0.12%, FELC at 0.18%.
  • Not a covered-call fund. The sold S&P 500 calls are paired with offsetting long exposure, so the overlay seeks incremental total return instead of capping upside.
  • Ordinary 1940 Act ETF wrapper, U.S. large-cap equity, distributions paid quarterly. The complexity lives in the overlay, not the tax paperwork.
  • Cost is the standout: the typical active U.S. equity ETF in this group charges several times what PEPS does, and fee drag is the one input you know in advance.
  • SPYC The overlay points both ways. A modest options budget aims to boost results in big moves in either direction, not just cushion a selloff.simplify.us
  • The equity sleeve is boring on purpose: an S&P 500 index ETF (IVV) does the heavy lifting, with the options bolted on top.simplify.us
  • 0.53% a year, below the 0.60% median for S&P 500 option-strategy funds, for a strategy most investors cannot rebuild in a brokerage account.
  • Trading since 2020, so the design has a multi-year live record instead of a backtest.

Worth knowing

  • PEPS Launched in November 2024. The overlay has not yet run through a full market cycle, so there is limited history to judge it on.
  • A small, thinly traded fund. Bid-ask spreads can run wider than a mega-cap index ETF's, which shows up most on larger orders.
  • The options leg adds moving parts: short index calls lose value in a sharp rally, and the offsetting long exposure is what has to make that back.
  • SPYC Buying options costs money every cycle. In markets that grind sideways, that budget is a drag on the index core.simplify.us
  • Thinly traded next to the giants of its category. Use limit orders and check the spread before you hit the button.
  • Not an income vehicle: it buys options rather than selling them, and pays quarterly. Premium-income peers like IVVW (0.25%) and GPIX (0.35%) charge less.

Full PEPS profile⁠

Full SPYC profile⁠

PEPS vs SPYC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PEPS vs SPYC Cost

Overpaying SPYC vs PEPS

$8,430

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PEPS 0.10%

    $2,106

  • SPYC 0.53%

    $10,536

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PEPS 0.10%
  • SPYC 0.53%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530SPYC $10,536PEPS $2,106

Year by year

YearPEPSSPYCOverpaying
10$183$953$770
20$717$3,658$2,941
30$2,106$10,536$8,430

Expense ratio

  • 0.10%PEPS, cheaper
  • 0.53%SPYC
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
  • Median 0.60%

PEPS cheapest of 51 funds

SPYC 20th cheapest of 51 funds

PEPS vs SPYC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
PEPS 0.97%
SPYC 1.13%, better
Payout (12M)
PEPS $0.32
SPYC $0.50
Last payment
PEPS $0.09
SPYC $0.20
Ex-dividend
PEPS Sep 21, 2026
SPYC Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
PEPS Sep 25, 2026
SPYC Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
PEPS Quarterly
SPYC Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

PEPSQuarterly · 8 paymentsAll PEPS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2024 $0.04; Mar 24, 2025 $0.07; Jun 23, 2025 $0.06; Sep 22, 2025 $0.07; Dec 23, 2025 $0.10; Mar 23, 2026 $0.06; Jun 22, 2026 $0.08; Sep 21, 2026 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.20202020232026YTD
SPYCQuarterly · 22 paymentsAll SPYC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 22 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 14, 2020 $0.11; Jun 28, 2021 $0.16; Sep 27, 2021 $0.13; Dec 27, 2021 $0.06; Mar 28, 2022 $0.15; Jun 27, 2022 $0.19; Dec 27, 2022 $0.00036; Mar 27, 2023 $0.14; Jun 27, 2023 $0.19; Sep 27, 2023 $0.10; Dec 26, 2023 $0.11; Mar 25, 2024 $0.10; Jun 25, 2024 $0.10; Sep 25, 2024 $0.08; Dec 23, 2024 $0.10; Mar 26, 2025 $0.08; Jun 25, 2025 $0.10; Sep 25, 2025 $0.10; Dec 23, 2025 $0.10; Mar 26, 2026 $0.10; Jun 25, 2026 $0.10; Sep 25, 2026 $0.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.20202020232026YTD

PEPS vs SPYC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PEPS 12.9%since Dec 2024SPYC 15.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PEPS 0.85since Dec 2024SPYC 0.91
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PEPS −21.3%since Nov 2024SPYC −28.5%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PEPS 1.02SPYC 1.14

Popular comparisons

  • PEPSBvsCSHIA

    Parametric Equity Plus ETF · Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SPYCCvsCSHIA

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF · Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PEPSBvsBALIA

    Parametric Equity Plus ETF · iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SPYCCvsBALIA

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF · iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PEPSBvsIVVWA

    Parametric Equity Plus ETF · iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SPYCCvsIVVWA

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF · iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.