PEPS ranks 20th and SPYC 39th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
PEPS vs SPYC
PEPS −0.43pt a year
0.10%0.53%
SPYC 49.6×the volume
36418.1K
PEPS vs SPYC Performance
+11.7%+1.9%
- PEPS 0.10%, better
- SPYC 0.53%
- PEPS $29M
- SPYC $69M
- PEPS +11.7%, better
- SPYC +1.9%
- PEPS 0.97%
- SPYC 1.13%, better
- PEPS 203
- SPYC 22
- PEPS 364 sh
- SPYC 18.1K sh, better
- PEPS $32.59
- SPYC $44.27
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PEPS | SPYC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | B60 |
| Mission | D29 | |
| Risk | F24Higher | F12 |
| Tradability | D31 | C53Higher |
| Holdings | A74Higher | C44 |
| Durability | D39 | C48Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. PEPS and SPYC are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PEPSB
SPYCC
In short
PEPS Active management at index-fund pricing. PEPS holds a U.S. large-cap base, then writes S&P 500 calls against offsetting long exposure: a beta-neutral overlay built to add return rather than swap upside for income.
SPYC Most funds in its peer group sell S&P 500 calls to harvest premium. SPYC does the opposite: a plain index core plus a small options budget built to pay off when the market makes an extreme move, up or down.
Stated mandate
PEPS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed, using a U.S. large-cap equity base and beta-neutral call overwriting on the S&P 500 with offsetting long exposure to seek incremental total return.
SPYC The fund seeks capital appreciation through U.S. large-cap exposure and a systematic options overlay designed to boost performance during extreme market moves in either direction.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PEPS vs SPYC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PEPS vs SPYC Cost
Overpaying SPYC vs PEPS
$8,430
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PEPS 0.10%
$2,106
SPYC 0.53%
$10,536
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PEPS | SPYC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $953 | $770 |
| 20 | $717 | $3,658 | $2,941 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $10,536 | $8,430 |
- 0.10%PEPS, cheaper
- 0.53%SPYC
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
PEPS cheapest of 51 funds
SPYC 20th cheapest of 51 funds
PEPS vs SPYC Dividends
- PEPS 0.97%
- SPYC 1.13%, better
- PEPS $0.32
- SPYC $0.50
- PEPS $0.09
- SPYC $0.20
- PEPS Sep 21, 2026
- SPYC Sep 25, 2026
- PEPS Sep 25, 2026
- SPYC Sep 30, 2026
- PEPS Quarterly
- SPYC Quarterly
Distribution history
PEPS vs SPYC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PEPS 12.9%SPYC 15.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- PEPS 0.85SPYC 0.91
- Worst fall
- PEPS −21.3%SPYC −28.5%
- Market sensitivity
- PEPS 1.02SPYC 1.14
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.