WTPI ranks 15th and PEPS 20th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
PEPS vs WTPI
PEPS −0.34pt a year
0.10%0.44%
WTPI 285.2×the volume
364104K
PEPS vs WTPI Performance
+11.7%+9.4%
- PEPS 0.10%, better
- WTPI 0.44%
- PEPS $29M
- WTPI $559M
- PEPS +11.7%, better
- WTPI +9.4%
- PEPS 0.97%
- WTPI 12.39%, better
- PEPS 203
- WTPI 4
- PEPS 364 sh
- WTPI 104K sh, better
- PEPS $32.59
- WTPI $32.33
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PEPS | WTPI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A71 |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | F24 | C43Higher |
| Tradability | D31 | C47Higher |
| Holdings | A74Higher | C42 |
| Durability | D39 | A86Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. PEPS and WTPI are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PEPSB
WTPIB
In short
PEPS Active management at index-fund pricing. PEPS holds a U.S. large-cap base, then writes S&P 500 calls against offsetting long exposure: a beta-neutral overlay built to add return rather than swap upside for income.
WTPI Most S&P 500 income ETFs own the stocks and sell calls. WTPI flips the trade: Treasury collateral plus put options written on the index twice a month, each sized to target a 2.5% premium.
Stated mandate
PEPS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed, using a U.S. large-cap equity base and beta-neutral call overwriting on the S&P 500 with offsetting long exposure to seek incremental total return.
WTPI The fund seeks capital appreciation and current income through a put-writing strategy tied to U.S. large-cap equity exposure. It is designed to provide enhanced income and potentially lower volatility than traditional equity exposure.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PEPS vs WTPI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PEPS vs WTPI Cost
Overpaying WTPI vs PEPS
$6,746
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PEPS 0.10%
$2,106
WTPI 0.44%
$8,852
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PEPS | WTPI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $794 | $611 |
| 20 | $717 | $3,061 | $2,344 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $8,852 | $6,746 |
- 0.10%PEPS, cheaper
- 0.44%WTPI
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
PEPS cheapest of 51 funds
WTPI 15th cheapest of 51 funds
PEPS vs WTPI Dividends
- PEPS 0.97%
- WTPI 12.39%, better
- PEPS $0.32
- WTPI $4.01
- PEPS $0.09
- WTPI $0.33
- PEPS Sep 21, 2026
- WTPI Oct 27, 2026
- PEPS Sep 25, 2026
- WTPI Oct 29, 2026
- PEPS Quarterly
- WTPI Monthly
Distribution history
PEPS vs WTPI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PEPS 12.9%WTPI 7.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- PEPS 0.85WTPI 1.41
- Worst fall
- PEPS −21.3%WTPI −16.6%
- Market sensitivity
- PEPS 1.02WTPI 0.58
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.