PEPS ranks 20th and XISE 39th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
PEPS vs XISE
PEPS −0.75pt a year
0.10%0.85%
XISE 17.2×the volume
3646.26K
PEPS vs XISE Performance
+11.7%+6.2%
- PEPS 0.10%, better
- XISE 0.85%
- PEPS $29M
- XISE $33M
- PEPS +11.7%, better
- XISE +6.2%
- PEPS 0.97%
- XISE 6.00%, better
- PEPS 203
- XISE 14
- PEPS 364 sh
- XISE 6.26K sh, better
- PEPS $32.59
- XISE $30.41
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PEPS | XISE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | D25 |
| Mission | D39 | |
| Risk | F24 | A72Higher |
| Tradability | D31 | C42Higher |
| Holdings | A74Higher | C40 |
| Durability | D39 | B55Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. PEPS and XISE are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PEPSB
XISEC
In short
PEPS Active management at index-fund pricing. PEPS holds a U.S. large-cap base, then writes S&P 500 calls against offsetting long exposure: a beta-neutral overlay built to add return rather than swap upside for income.
XISE A buffered S&P 500 fund that swaps the rally for a paycheck: XISE targets a stated income rate for the year and cushions the first 10% of the underlying ETF's losses, with the terms reset every September.
Stated mandate
PEPS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed, using a U.S. large-cap equity base and beta-neutral call overwriting on the S&P 500 with offsetting long exposure to seek incremental total return.
XISE The Fund seeks to provide approximately 6.88% annualized income before fees and expenses while buffering the first 10% of losses of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust during the current target outcome period. It uses FLEX Options and short-term U.S. Treasury securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PEPS vs XISE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PEPS vs XISE Cost
Overpaying XISE vs PEPS
$14,093
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PEPS 0.10%
$2,106
XISE 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PEPS | XISE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $1,508 | $1,325 |
| 20 | $717 | $5,706 | $4,989 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $16,199 | $14,093 |
- 0.10%PEPS, cheaper
- 0.85%XISE
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
PEPS cheapest of 51 funds
XISE 38th cheapest of 51 funds
PEPS vs XISE Dividends
- PEPS 0.97%
- XISE 6.00%, better
- PEPS $0.32
- XISE $1.82
- PEPS $0.09
- XISE $0.15
- PEPS Sep 21, 2026
- XISE Sep 18, 2026
- PEPS Sep 25, 2026
- XISE Sep 21, 2026
- PEPS Quarterly
- XISE Irregular
Distribution history
PEPS vs XISE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PEPS 12.9%XISE 2.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- PEPS 0.85XISE 1.04
- Worst fall
- PEPS −21.3%XISE −6.2%
- Market sensitivity
- PEPS 1.02XISE 0.14
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.