PEPS ranks 20th and XPAY 20th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
PEPS vs XPAY
0.0%by weight
PEPS −0.39pt a year
0.10%0.49%
XPAY 126.8×the volume
36446.2K
PEPS vs XPAY Performance
+11.7%+11.2%
- PEPS 0.10%, better
- XPAY 0.49%
- PEPS $29M
- XPAY $184M
- PEPS +11.7%, better
- XPAY +11.2%
- PEPS 0.97%
- XPAY 21.59%, better
- PEPS 203
- XPAY 2
- PEPS 364 sh
- XPAY 46.2K sh, better
- PEPS $32.59
- XPAY $50.69
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PEPS | XPAY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | B65 |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | F24 | D28Higher |
| Tradability | D31 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | A74Higher | C51 |
| Durability | D39 | C54Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. PEPS and XPAY are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PEPSB
XPAYB
In short
PEPS Active management at index-fund pricing. PEPS holds a U.S. large-cap base, then writes S&P 500 calls against offsetting long exposure: a beta-neutral overlay built to add return rather than swap upside for income.
XPAY Most S&P 500 income funds sell upside to fund the check. XPAY skips that: it holds index exposure through FLEX options and pays out 20% of its year-end NAV in twelve monthly slices, mostly as return of capital.
Stated mandate
PEPS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed, using a U.S. large-cap equity base and beta-neutral call overwriting on the S&P 500 with offsetting long exposure to seek incremental total return.
XPAY The fund seeks current income while also seeking exposure to the performance of the S&P 500 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PEPS vs XPAY Holdings
How PEPS and XPAY differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of PEPS and 0.0% of XPAY.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for PEPS.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in PEPSMore in XPAY | PEPS | XPAY |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | XPAY +0.2 points | 99.3% | 99.5% |
| China | PEPS +0.3 points | 0.4% | 0.1% |
| Switzerland | XPAY +0.2 points | 0.1% | 0.3% |
| Brazil | PEPS +0.2 points | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Mexico | XPAY +0.1 points | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Finland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- PEPS38.5%
- XPAY100.0%
- PEPS202
- XPAY2
Asset class
- PEPS
- Equity
- XPAY
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in PEPS202
- In both0
- Only in XPAY2
Only in PEPS
202 securities, 100% of PEPS by weight
- Apple Inc Common Stock7.48%
- NVIDIA Corp Common Stock6.80%
- Microsoft Corp Common5.70%
- Msilf Government4.01%
- Amazon.com Inc Common3.42%
- Alphabet Inc-Cl A -2.42%
- Broadcom Inc Common Stock2.40%
- Alphabet Inc-Cl C -2.16%
- Eli Lilly and Company2.09%
- Meta Platforms Inc Common2.04%
- Tesla Inc Common Stock1.85%
- Micron Technology Inc1.84%
- Advanced Micro Devices1.65%
- JPMorgan Chase & Co1.64%
- Exxonmobil Holdings Corp1.54%
- Berkshire Hathaway Inc1.34%
- Visa Inc Common Stock USD1.30%
- Johnson & Johnson Common1.27%
- AbbVie Inc Common Stock1.05%
- Mastercard Inc Common1.01%
- Chevron Corp Common Stock1.00%
- Cisco Systems Inc Common0.94%
- Walmart Inc Common Stock0.92%
- Costco Wholesale Corp0.87%
- Merck & Co Inc Common0.83%
- The Coca-Cola Company0.80%
- Lam Research Corp Common0.77%
- Philip Morris0.72%
- Bank of America Corp0.71%
- General Electric Co0.70%
- The Procter & Gamble0.69%
- Palantir Technologies Inc0.69%
- UnitedHealth Group Inc0.68%
- Home Depot Inc/The Common0.67%
- Rtx Corp0.65%
- Wells Fargo & Co Common0.59%
- Salesforce.com Inc.0.57%
- Linde PLC Common Stock0.57%
- Seagate Technology0.55%
- Amgen Inc Common Stock0.54%
- Thermo Fisher Scientific0.52%
- Netflix Inc Common Stock0.50%
- Ge Vernova Inc Common0.49%
- Dell Technologies Inc0.47%
- Bank of New York Mellon0.47%
- Csx Corp Common Stock USD0.45%
- The Walt Disney Company0.45%
- Mcdonald's Corp Common0.45%
- Eaton Corp PLC Common0.45%
- Atlassian Corp Common0.44%
Only in XPAY
2 securities, 100% of XPAY by weight
- Spy 12/10/2027 38.04 C94.32%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20315.72%
Weight gaps
PEPS and XPAY share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PEPS vs XPAY Cost
Overpaying XPAY vs PEPS
$7,686
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PEPS 0.10%
$2,106
XPAY 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PEPS | XPAY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $883 | $700 |
| 20 | $717 | $3,394 | $2,677 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $9,792 | $7,686 |
- 0.10%PEPS, cheaper
- 0.49%XPAY
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
PEPS cheapest of 51 funds
XPAY 17th cheapest of 51 funds
PEPS vs XPAY Dividends
- PEPS 0.97%
- XPAY 21.59%, better
- PEPS $0.32
- XPAY $10.90
- PEPS $0.09
- XPAY $0.90
- PEPS Sep 21, 2026
- XPAY Oct 14, 2026
- PEPS Sep 25, 2026
- XPAY Oct 15, 2026
- PEPS Quarterly
- XPAY Monthly
Distribution history
PEPS vs XPAY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PEPS 12.9%XPAY 12.9%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- PEPS 0.85XPAY 0.87
- Worst fall
- PEPS −21.3%XPAY −18.2%
- Market sensitivity
- PEPS 1.02XPAY 1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.