PEPS ranks 20th and XRMI 23rd of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
PEPS vs XRMI
PEPS −0.50pt a year
0.10%0.60%
XRMI 59.8×the volume
36421.8K
PEPS vs XRMI Performance
+11.7%+8.0%
- PEPS 0.10%, better
- XRMI 0.60%
- PEPS $29M
- XRMI $63M
- PEPS +11.7%, better
- XRMI +8.0%
- PEPS 0.97%
- XRMI 12.45%, better
- PEPS 203
- XRMI 507
- PEPS 364 sh
- XRMI 21.8K sh, better
- PEPS $32.59
- XRMI $16.98
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PEPS | XRMI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | C50 |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | F24 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | D31 | D32Higher |
| Holdings | A74Higher | B65 |
| Durability | D39 | C54Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. PEPS and XRMI are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PEPSB
XRMIB
In short
PEPS Active management at index-fund pricing. PEPS holds a U.S. large-cap base, then writes S&P 500 calls against offsetting long exposure: a beta-neutral overlay built to add return rather than swap upside for income.
XRMI A covered-call fund with a seatbelt. XRMI owns the S&P 500, sells at-the-money calls for income, and spends part of that premium on puts 5% below the market, so the hedge is built in rather than bolted on. Pays monthly.
Stated mandate
PEPS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed, using a U.S. large-cap equity base and beta-neutral call overwriting on the S&P 500 with offsetting long exposure to seek incremental total return.
XRMI XRMI seeks returns broadly corresponding to the price and yield performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Risk Managed Income Index. It owns S&P 500 stocks and uses a net-credit collar to generate income while mitigating significant market declines.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PEPS vs XRMI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PEPS vs XRMI Cost
Overpaying XRMI vs PEPS
$9,711
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PEPS 0.10%
$2,106
XRMI 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PEPS | XRMI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $1,076 | $893 |
| 20 | $717 | $4,116 | $3,399 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $11,817 | $9,711 |
- 0.10%PEPS, cheaper
- 0.60%XRMI
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
PEPS cheapest of 51 funds
XRMI 25th cheapest of 51 funds
PEPS vs XRMI Dividends
- PEPS 0.97%
- XRMI 12.45%, better
- PEPS $0.32
- XRMI $2.12
- PEPS $0.09
- XRMI $0.15
- PEPS Sep 21, 2026
- XRMI Oct 19, 2026
- PEPS Sep 25, 2026
- XRMI Oct 22, 2026
- PEPS Quarterly
- XRMI Monthly
Distribution history
PEPS vs XRMI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PEPS 12.9%XRMI 5.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- PEPS 0.85XRMI 0.93
- Worst fall
- PEPS −21.3%XRMI −15.3%
- Market sensitivity
- PEPS 1.02XRMI 0.35
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.