XYLG ranks 10th and PEPS 21st of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
PEPS vs XYLG
PEPS −0.25pt a year
0.10%0.35%
XYLG 52.5×the volume
41721.9K
PEPS vs XYLG Performance
+13.2%+14.2%
- PEPS 0.10%, better
- XYLG 0.35%
- PEPS $28M
- XYLG $71M
- PEPS +13.2%
- XYLG +14.2%, better
- PEPS 0.98%
- XYLG 12.72%, better
- PEPS 192
- XYLG 505
- PEPS 417 sh
- XYLG 21.9K sh, better
- PEPS $31.53
- XYLG $28.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PEPS | XYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A79 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | D25 | B58Higher |
| Tradability | D33Higher | D31 |
| Holdings | A71 | A75Higher |
| Durability | D39 | B56Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. PEPS and XYLG are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PEPSB
XYLGA
In short
PEPS Active management at index-fund pricing. PEPS holds a U.S. large-cap base, then writes S&P 500 calls against offsetting long exposure: a beta-neutral overlay built to add return rather than swap upside for income.
XYLG The covered call trade at half strength. XYLG holds the S&P 500 and writes calls on only about half the portfolio, so half the index's upside stays uncapped while the other half funds monthly income.
Stated mandate
PEPS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed, using a U.S. large-cap equity base and beta-neutral call overwriting on the S&P 500 with offsetting long exposure to seek incremental total return.
XYLG The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Half BuyWrite Index before fees and expenses. It buys S&P 500 stocks and sells corresponding call options on about half of the portfolio, combining option income with partial upside exposure.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PEPS vs XYLG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PEPS vs XYLG Cost
Overpaying XYLG vs PEPS
$5,020
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PEPS 0.10%
$2,106
XYLG 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PEPS | XYLG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $634 | $451 |
| 20 | $717 | $2,454 | $1,737 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $7,126 | $5,020 |
- 0.10%PEPS, cheaper
- 0.35%XYLG
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
PEPS cheapest of 51 funds
XYLG 11th cheapest of 51 funds
PEPS vs XYLG Dividends
- PEPS 0.98%
- XYLG 12.72%, better
- PEPS $0.32
- XYLG $3.71
- PEPS $0.09
- XYLG $0.11
- PEPS Sep 21, 2026
- XYLG Oct 19, 2026
- PEPS Sep 25, 2026
- XYLG Oct 22, 2026
- PEPS Quarterly
- XYLG Monthly
Distribution history
PEPS vs XYLG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PEPS 12.9%XYLG 8.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- PEPS 0.85XYLG 1.53
- Worst fall
- PEPS −21.3%XYLG −21.3%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- PEPS 1.02XYLG 0.71
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.