PEPS ranks 20th and ZHDG 45th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
PEPS vs ZHDG
PEPS −0.85pt a year
0.10%0.95%
ZHDG 17.6×the volume
3646.41K
PEPS vs ZHDG Performance
+11.7%+4.1%
- PEPS 0.10%, better
- ZHDG 0.95%
- PEPS $29M
- ZHDG $31M
- PEPS +11.7%, better
- ZHDG +4.1%
- PEPS 0.97%
- ZHDG 2.46%, better
- PEPS 203
- ZHDG 10
- PEPS 364 sh
- ZHDG 6.41K sh, better
- PEPS $32.59
- ZHDG $24.03
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PEPS | ZHDG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F14 |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | F24 | D35Higher |
| Tradability | D31Higher | F18 |
| Holdings | A74 | |
| Durability | D39 | C44Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. PEPS and ZHDG are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PEPSB
ZHDGD
In short
PEPS Active management at index-fund pricing. PEPS holds a U.S. large-cap base, then writes S&P 500 calls against offsetting long exposure: a beta-neutral overlay built to add return rather than swap upside for income.
ZHDG Most S&P 500 options funds sell calls for income. ZHDG buys them: laddered long calls plus income assets and protective puts, aiming to hold equity-sleeve losses near 8-10% over any 12 months. Costs 0.95%.
Stated mandate
PEPS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed, using a U.S. large-cap equity base and beta-neutral call overwriting on the S&P 500 with offsetting long exposure to seek incremental total return.
ZHDG The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while mitigating overall market risk.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PEPS vs ZHDG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PEPS vs ZHDG Cost
Overpaying ZHDG vs PEPS
$15,763
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PEPS 0.10%
$2,106
ZHDG 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PEPS | ZHDG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $1,678 | $1,495 |
| 20 | $717 | $6,322 | $5,605 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $17,869 | $15,763 |
- 0.10%PEPS, cheaper
- 0.95%ZHDG
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
PEPS cheapest of 51 funds
ZHDG 43rd cheapest of 51 funds
PEPS vs ZHDG Dividends
- PEPS 0.97%
- ZHDG 2.46%, better
- PEPS $0.32
- ZHDG $0.58
- PEPS $0.09
- ZHDG $0.58
- PEPS Sep 21, 2026
- ZHDG Dec 24, 2025
- PEPS Sep 25, 2026
- ZHDG Dec 26, 2025
- PEPS Quarterly
- ZHDG Annual
Distribution history
PEPS vs ZHDG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PEPS 12.9%ZHDG 10.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- PEPS 0.85ZHDG 0.98
- Worst fall
- PEPS −21.3%ZHDG −23.3%
- Market sensitivity
- PEPS 1.02ZHDG 0.80
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.