PSMO ranks 1st and PFEB 14th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
PFEB vs PSMO
0.0%by weight
PSMO −0.30pt a year
0.79%0.49%
PFEB 3.9×the volume
28.3K7.3K
PSMO +1.0pt
+8.7%+9.7%
PFEB vs PSMO Performance
+51.5%+58.6%
- PFEB 0.79%
- PSMO 0.49%, better
- PFEB $884M
- PSMO $116M
- PFEB +9.9%, better
- PSMO +9.7%
- PFEB 3
- PSMO 3
- PFEB 28.3K sh, better
- PSMO 7.3K sh
- PFEB $44.07
- PSMO $33.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PFEB | PSMO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | C54 | C54 |
| Tradability | B58 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A77Higher | B66 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. PFEB and PSMO are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PFEBC
PSMOB
In short
PFEB February is the whole point. PFEB restarts each year with a fresh 15% cushion against SPY losses, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside that resets at the same time. Same recipe as its sibling months, different calendar.
PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.
Stated mandate
PFEB The Fund seeks to follow SPY’s return up to a predetermined cap and protect investors from the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.
PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PFEB vs PSMO Holdings
How PFEB and PSMO differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of PFEB and 0.0% of PSMO.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
- Sector97.4%
Sector
| Sector | More in PFEBMore in PSMO | PFEB | PSMO |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | PSMO +1.2 points | 8.7% | 9.9% |
| Technology | PFEB +1.0 points | 40.1% | 39.1% |
| Health Care | PFEB +1.1 points | 9.4% | 8.3% |
| Communication | PSMO +0.7 points | 9.9% | 10.6% |
| Energy | PFEB +0.3 points | 3.4% | 3.1% |
| Financials | PFEB +0.2 points | 11.3% | 11.1% |
| Utilities | PSMO +0.2 points | 1.9% | 2.1% |
| Industrials | PSMO +0.2 points | 7.6% | 7.8% |
| Consumer Staples | PSMO +0.1 points | 4.4% | 4.5% |
| Real Estate | PSMO +0.1 points | 1.7% | 1.8% |
| Materials | PSMO +0.1 points | 1.6% | 1.7% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in PFEBMore in PSMO | PFEB | PSMO |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- PFEB102.6%
- PSMO105.5%
- PFEB3
- PSMO2
Asset class
- PFEB
- Equity
- PSMO
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in PFEB3
- In both0
- Only in PSMO2
Only in PFEB
3 securities, 100% of PFEB by weight
- Spy 01/29/2027 6.92 C101.08%
- Spy 01/29/2027 691.97 P1.24%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.24%
Only in PSMO
2 securities, 100% of PSMO by weight
- Spy 09/30/2027 8.47 C97.65%
- Spy 09/30/2027 762.71 P5.36%
Weight gaps
PFEB and PSMO share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PFEB vs PSMO Cost
Overpaying PFEB vs PSMO
$5,382
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PFEB 0.79%
$15,174
PSMO 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PFEB | PSMO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $883 | $522 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $3,394 | $1,937 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $9,792 | $5,382 |
- 0.79%PFEB
- 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds
PFEB 24th cheapest of 51 funds
PFEB vs PSMO Dividends
- PFEB None
- PSMO None
Distribution history
PFEB vs PSMO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PFEB
- PSMO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PFEB 6.1%PSMO 5.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PFEB 1.43, betterPSMO 1.31
- Worst fall
- PFEB −11.0%PSMO −9.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- PFEB 0.45PSMO 0.41
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.