Skip to content

PFEB vs PSMO

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

PFEBCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

PSMOBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PSMO −0.30pt a year

PFEB0.79%PSMO0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PFEB 3.9×the volume

PFEB28.3KPSMO7.3K

5Y return · a year

PSMO +1.0pt

PFEB+8.7%PSMO+9.7%

PFEB vs PSMO Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+51.5%PFEB+58.6%PSMO

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. PFEB +51.5%. PSMO +58.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%20%30%40%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
PFEB 0.79%
PSMO 0.49%, better
Fund size
PFEB $884M
PSMO $116M
1Y total return
PFEB +9.9%, better
PSMO +9.7%
Holdings
PFEB 3
PSMO 3
Avg volume (30D)
PFEB 28.3K sh, better
PSMO 7.3K sh
NAV per share
PFEB $44.07
PSMO $33.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PFEB: Cost 35, Risk 54, Mission not scored, Tradability 58, Holdings not scored, Durability 77. PSMO: Cost 70, Risk 54, Mission 95, Tradability 65, Holdings not scored, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for PFEB, PSMO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPFEBPSMO
Cost30% weightD35A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightC54C54
Tradability15% weightB58B65Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA77HigherB66

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PFEB and PSMO are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMO ranks 1st and PFEB 14th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 13CPJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 49
  4. Rank 14CPFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 48
  5. Rank 14CPMAYInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - MayScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PFEBCInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

PSMOBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

In short

PFEB February is the whole point. PFEB restarts each year with a fresh 15% cushion against SPY losses, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside that resets at the same time. Same recipe as its sibling months, different calendar.

PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.

Stated mandate

PFEB The Fund seeks to follow SPY’s return up to a predetermined cap and protect investors from the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.

PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • PFEB The contract is simple: absorb the first 15% of SPY's decline over the outcome period, then follow SPY's gains up to a predetermined cap.innovatoretfs.com
  • The reference asset is SPY itself, not a bespoke in-house index. You are hedging the same S&P 500 exposure millions of people already hold.innovatoretfs.com
  • At 0.79%, the fee sits right at the middle of its buffer-fund cohort. The options machinery costs what it costs across this group.
  • Innovator has run the February lane since 2020, and the fund stands in the upper half of a crowded field of 15% buffer strategies.
  • PSMO Charges 0.49% a year versus a 0.79% median across its 15%-buffer peer group, one of the lower-cost ways to own this structure.
  • Pacer's moderate SOS funds (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ) all price at 0.49%, while the Innovator power-buffer lineup (POCT, PJUL, PJAN) runs 0.79%.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, not an abstract index, so what's being buffered is a fund you can watch tick by tick.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • PFEB Buffer and cap are defined for a full outcome period. Enter mid-period and you inherit whatever cushion and upside are left, not the headline 15%.innovatoretfs.com
  • The cap cuts both ways. In a roaring year for the S&P 500, participation stops where the cap stops.innovatoretfs.com
  • It trades less actively than the largest buffer ETFs, which can show up as wider bid-ask spreads. Also a price-return vehicle: no distribution stream.
  • PSMO Buffer and cap are engineered for the full one-year outcome period running October through September. Buy or sell mid-period and you may get neither in full.paceretfs.com
  • Upside stops at a cap reset each October. A runaway rally in the S&P 500 is the scenario this structure hands back in exchange for the 15% cushion.paceretfs.com
  • One of the quieter tickers in the buffer aisle, so spreads and order type matter more here than with the category's household names.

Full PFEB profile⁠

Full PSMO profile⁠

PFEB vs PSMO Holdings

How PFEB and PSMO differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of PFEB and 0.0% of PSMO.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors97.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in PFEB and PSMO, widest gap first
SectorMore in PFEBMore in PSMO
Consumer DiscretionaryPSMO +1.2 points
TechnologyPFEB +1.0 points
Health CarePFEB +1.1 points
CommunicationPSMO +0.7 points
EnergyPFEB +0.3 points
FinancialsPFEB +0.2 points
UtilitiesPSMO +0.2 points
IndustrialsPSMO +0.2 points
Consumer StaplesPSMO +0.1 points
Real EstatePSMO +0.1 points
MaterialsPSMO +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in PFEB and PSMO, widest gap first
CountryMore in PFEBMore in PSMO
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • PFEB102.6%
  • PSMO105.5%

Securities held

  • PFEB3
  • PSMO2

Asset class

PFEB
Equity
PSMO
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in PFEB3
  • In both0
  • Only in PSMO2

Only in PFEB

3 securities, 100% of PFEB by weight

  • Spy 01/29/2027 6.92 C101.08%
  • Spy 01/29/2027 691.97 P1.24%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.24%

Only in PSMO

2 securities, 100% of PSMO by weight

  • Spy 09/30/2027 8.47 C97.65%
  • Spy 09/30/2027 762.71 P5.36%

Weight gaps

PFEB and PSMO share no securities.

All 6 PFEB holdings⁠All 6 PSMO holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PFEB vs PSMO Cost

Overpaying PFEB vs PSMO

$5,382

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PFEB 0.79%

    $15,174

  • PSMO 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PFEB 0.79%
  • PSMO 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530PFEB $15,174PSMO $9,792

Year by year

YearPFEBPSMOOverpaying
10$1,405$883$522
20$5,331$3,394$1,937
30$15,174$9,792$5,382

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%PFEB
  • 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds

PFEB 24th cheapest of 51 funds

PFEB vs PSMO Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
PFEB None
PSMO None

Distribution history

PFEBAll PFEB payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMOAll PSMO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PFEB vs PSMO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • PFEB
  • PSMO
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: PFEB −11.0% · Jun 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−8%−6%−4%−2%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PFEB 6.1%PSMO 5.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PFEB 1.43, betterPSMO 1.31
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PFEB −11.0%PSMO −9.8%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PFEB 0.45PSMO 0.41

Popular comparisons

  • PFEBCvsPSMJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsPSMJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PFEBCvsPSMRB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PFEBCvsBUFCB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.