PSMO ranks 1st and PJAN 10th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
PJAN vs PSMO
0.0%by weight
PSMO −0.30pt a year
0.79%0.49%
PJAN 7.2×the volume
52.8K7.3K
PSMO +0.8pt
+8.9%+9.7%
PJAN vs PSMO Performance
+53.4%+59.2%
- PJAN 0.79%
- PSMO 0.49%, better
- PJAN $1.41B
- PSMO $116M
- PJAN +10.1%, better
- PSMO +10.0%
- PJAN 3
- PSMO 3
- PJAN 52.8K sh, better
- PSMO 7.3K sh
- PJAN $50.78
- PSMO $33.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PJAN | PSMO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | C52 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | A72Higher | B64 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A88Higher | B66 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. PJAN and PSMO are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PJANC
PSMOB
In short
PJAN The January edition of Innovator's 15% Power Buffer series: it absorbs the first 15% of an S&P 500 price drop over the year in exchange for a capped upside, then resets every January 1. One of the originals, running since 2019.
PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.
Stated mandate
PJAN The fund uses a defined-outcome strategy tied to SPY, seeking to track its return up to a cap while protecting the first 15% of losses during the annual outcome period.
PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PJAN vs PSMO Holdings
How PJAN and PSMO differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of PJAN and 0.0% of PSMO.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for PJAN.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in PJANMore in PSMO | PJAN | PSMO |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- PJAN102.5%
- PSMO104.3%
- PJAN3
- PSMO2
Asset class
- PJAN
- Equity
- PSMO
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in PJAN3
- In both0
- Only in PSMO2
Only in PJAN
3 securities, 100% of PJAN by weight
- Spy 12/31/2026 6.82 C101.44%
- Spy 12/31/2026 681.92 P0.76%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.27%
Only in PSMO
2 securities, 100% of PSMO by weight
- Spy 09/30/2027 8.47 C98.58%
- Spy 09/30/2027 762.71 P4.59%
Weight gaps
PJAN and PSMO share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PJAN vs PSMO Cost
Overpaying PJAN vs PSMO
$5,382
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PJAN 0.79%
$15,174
PSMO 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PJAN | PSMO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $883 | $522 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $3,394 | $1,937 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $9,792 | $5,382 |
- 0.79%PJAN
- 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds
PJAN 24th cheapest of 51 funds
PJAN vs PSMO Dividends
- PJAN None
- PSMO None
Distribution history
PJAN vs PSMO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PJAN
- PSMO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PJAN 6.2%PSMO 5.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PJAN 1.45, betterPSMO 1.31
- Worst fall
- PJAN −11.9%PSMO −9.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- PJAN 0.50PSMO 0.41
PJAN and PSMO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
