Skip to content

PJUL vs PSMO

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

PJULCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

PSMOBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSMO −0.30pt a year

PJUL0.79%PSMO0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PJUL 15.0×the volume

PJUL109KPSMO7.3K

5Y return · a year

PJUL +0.4pt

PJUL+10.1%PSMO+9.7%

PJUL vs PSMO Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+62.0%PJUL+58.6%PSMO

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. PJUL +62.0%. PSMO +58.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%20%30%40%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
PJUL 0.79%
PSMO 0.49%, better
Fund size
PJUL $1.29B
PSMO $116M
1Y total return
PJUL +7.7%
PSMO +9.7%, better
Yield (12M)
PJUL 0.00%
PSMO No data
Holdings
PJUL 3
PSMO 3
Avg volume (30D)
PJUL 109K sh, better
PSMO 7.3K sh
NAV per share
PJUL $49.56
PSMO $33.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PJUL: Cost 35, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings not scored, Durability 88. PSMO: Cost 70, Risk 54, Mission 95, Tradability 65, Holdings not scored, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for PJUL, PSMO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPJULPSMO
Cost30% weightD35A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightC47C54Higher
Tradability15% weightB67HigherB65
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA88HigherB66

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PJUL and PSMO are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMO ranks 1st and PJUL 13th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 11CTENMiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETFScore 50
  4. Rank 13CPJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 49
  5. Rank 14CPFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PJULCInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

PSMOBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

In short

PJUL Rides the S&P 500, absorbs the first 15% of a 12-month drawdown, and gives up upside above a cap in exchange. Innovator's July-reset Power Buffer, running the same playbook since 2018.

PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.

Stated mandate

PJUL The Fund seeks to track the return of SPY up to a predetermined cap while protecting investors from the first 15% of losses over the current outcome period.

PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • PJUL The buffer is the whole product: built to absorb the first 15% of reference-index losses across each one-year outcome period, with upside capped in return.innovatoretfs.com
  • Trades tightly for a defined-outcome fund, and at multi-billion-dollar size it is one of the more established names on the buffer shelf.
  • A 2018 vintage that has carried its buffer through real market cycles, and among buffer funds we grade it sits near the top of the group.
  • PSMO Charges 0.49% a year versus a 0.79% median across its 15%-buffer peer group, one of the lower-cost ways to own this structure.
  • Pacer's moderate SOS funds (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ) all price at 0.49%, while the Innovator power-buffer lineup (POCT, PJUL, PJAN) runs 0.79%.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, not an abstract index, so what's being buffered is a fund you can watch tick by tick.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • PJUL Cap and buffer are set at the July 1 reset and apply to full-period holders. Step in midstream and your effective cap and remaining buffer differ from the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.79% is the category median, not the floor. The laddered sibling BUFF lists 0.10% and spreads the same Power Buffer approach across staggered start dates.
  • Income is not part of the design. The options-based structure has not been throwing off distributions.
  • PSMO Buffer and cap are engineered for the full one-year outcome period running October through September. Buy or sell mid-period and you may get neither in full.paceretfs.com
  • Upside stops at a cap reset each October. A runaway rally in the S&P 500 is the scenario this structure hands back in exchange for the 15% cushion.paceretfs.com
  • One of the quieter tickers in the buffer aisle, so spreads and order type matter more here than with the category's household names.

Full PJUL profile⁠

Full PSMO profile⁠

PJUL vs PSMO Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PJUL vs PSMO Cost

Overpaying PJUL vs PSMO

$5,382

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PJUL 0.79%

    $15,174

  • PSMO 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PJUL 0.79%
  • PSMO 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530PJUL $15,174PSMO $9,792

Year by year

YearPJULPSMOOverpaying
10$1,405$883$522
20$5,331$3,394$1,937
30$15,174$9,792$5,382

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%PJUL
  • 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds

PJUL 24th cheapest of 51 funds

PJUL vs PSMO Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
PJUL 0.00%
PSMO No data
Payout (12M)
PJUL None
PSMO None

Distribution history

Per share, 2019, same scale for both

PJUL1 paymentAll PJUL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2019. Nov 19, 2019 $0.22. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252019
PSMOAll PSMO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PJUL vs PSMO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • PJUL
  • PSMO
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: PJUL −10.7% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−6%−4%−2%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PJUL 6.3%PSMO 5.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PJUL 1.44, betterPSMO 1.31
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PJUL −10.7%PSMO −9.8%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PJUL 0.47PSMO 0.41

Popular comparisons

  • PJULCvsPSMJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsPSMJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PJULCvsPSMRB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PJULCvsBUFCB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.