USCA ranks 2nd and PKW 23rd of 30 funds in the US Factor Index Category.
PKW vs USCA
USCA −0.56pt a year
0.63%0.07%
USCA 3.4×the volume
29K97.9K
PKW +0.3pt
+20.8%+20.5%
PKW vs USCA Performance
+17.5%+7.7%
- PKW 0.63%
- USCA 0.07%, better
- PKW $1.77B
- USCA $3.42B
- PKW +17.5%, better
- USCA +7.7%
- PKW 0.64%
- USCA 1.05%, better
- PKW 287
- USCA 392
- PKW 29K sh
- USCA 97.9K sh, better
- PKW $150.53
- USCA $44.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PKW | USCA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A91 | |
| Risk | B67Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | B66Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | D38Higher | D29 |
| Durability | B60Higher | C49 |
Rank among US Factor Index funds
Same Category. PKW and USCA are both graded against the same 30 US Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PKWD
USCAA
In short
PKW A buyback fund with a real bar to clear: companies must have shrunk their net share count by 5% or more over the past year. PKW has tracked that same index since 2006, for 0.63%.
USCA The largest US ETF debut on record when it launched in 2023, seeded by a Finnish pension fund. It owns roughly 400 US large- and mid-caps, keeping only the top half of each sector on MSCI's climate-transition scoring, for 0.07% a year.
Stated mandate
PKW The fund seeks exposure to the Nasdaq US BuyBack Achievers Index by normally investing at least 90% of assets in the common stocks comprising that index.
USCA The fund seeks to track the MSCI USA Climate Action Index before fees and expenses through a passive indexing strategy. The index selects U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies assessed as leading sector peers in climate-transition positioning and actions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PKW vs USCA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PKW vs USCA Cost
Overpaying PKW vs USCA
$10,879
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PKW 0.63%
$12,359
USCA 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PKW | USCA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,128 | $128 | $1,000 |
| 20 | $4,311 | $503 | $3,808 |
| 30 | $12,359 | $1,480 | $10,879 |
- 0.63%PKW
- 0.07%USCA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Factor Index funds
- Median 0.30%
USCA 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
PKW 30th cheapest of 30 funds
PKW vs USCA Dividends
- PKW 0.64%
- USCA 1.05%, better
- PKW $0.97
- USCA $0.47
- PKW $0.22
- USCA $0.10
- PKW Sep 21, 2026
- USCA Sep 18, 2026
- PKW Sep 25, 2026
- USCA Sep 25, 2026
- PKW Quarterly
- USCA Quarterly
Distribution history
PKW vs USCA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PKW 14.5%USCA 12.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PKW 1.13USCA 1.27, better
- Worst fall
- PKW −23.5%USCA −19.2%
- Market sensitivity
- PKW 0.82USCA 1.00
Popular comparisons
- 0.63% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.