PLTU ranks 3rd and PLTL 6th of 7 funds in the 2x Long Palantir (PLTR) Category.
PLTL vs PLTU
0.0%by weight
PLTL −0.77pt a year
0.20%0.97%
PLTU 2109.4×the volume
1.12K2.36M
PLTL vs PLTU Performance
+95.6%+96.4%
- PLTL 0.20%, better
- PLTU 0.97%
- PLTL $1M
- PLTU $375M
- PLTL
- PLTU −46.0%
- PLTL
- PLTU 32.31%
- PLTL 1
- PLTU 10
- PLTL 1.12K sh
- PLTU 2.36M sh, better
- PLTL $62.11
- PLTU $60.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PLTL | PLTU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | C52 |
| Mission | A89 | |
| Risk | A83Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | D30 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | F16 | A77Higher |
Rank among 2x Long Palantir (PLTR) funds
Same Category. PLTL and PLTU are both graded against the same 7 2x Long Palantir (PLTR) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PLTLC
PLTUB
In short
PLTU Palantir with the volume turned up. PLTU aims for 200% of PLTR's daily move and resets every night, so it behaves like a trading tool rather than a buy-and-hold sleeve, and it charges less than the median 2x PLTR fund.
Stated mandate
PLTU The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the performance of Palantir Technologies Inc. common shares, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PLTL vs PLTU Holdings
How PLTL and PLTU differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of PLTL and 0.0% of PLTU.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for PLTL.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in PLTLMore in PLTU | PLTL | PLTU |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- PLTL198.8%
- PLTU100.0%
- PLTL0
- PLTU3
Asset class
- PLTL
- Leveraged/Inverse
- PLTU
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in PLTL0
- In both0
- Only in PLTU3
Only in PLTL
0 securities, 0.0% of PLTL by weight
Only in PLTU
3 securities, 28.6% of PLTU by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 50617.77%
- Palantir Technologies Inc-A7.46%
- Goldman Sachs Fin Gov 465 Institut3.37%
Weight gaps
PLTL and PLTU share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PLTL vs PLTU Cost
Overpaying PLTU vs PLTL
$14,043
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PLTL 0.20%
$4,155
PLTU 0.97%
$18,198
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PLTL | PLTU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $1,712 | $1,347 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $6,443 | $5,022 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $18,198 | $14,043 |
- 0.20%PLTL, cheaper
- 0.97%PLTU
- Middle half of 2x Long Palantir (PLTR) funds
- Median 0.97%
PLTL cheapest of 7 funds
PLTU 4th cheapest of 7 funds
PLTL vs PLTU Dividends
- PLTL
- PLTU 32.31%
- PLTL None
- PLTU $17.13
- PLTL
- PLTU $0.22
- PLTL
- PLTU Sep 22, 2026
- PLTL
- PLTU Sep 29, 2026
- PLTL
- PLTU Quarterly
Distribution history
PLTL vs PLTU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PLTL PLTU 122.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- PLTL PLTU 0.83
- Worst fall
- PLTL PLTU −79.7%
- Market sensitivity
- PLTL 0.00PLTU 0.85
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.