PLTU ranks 3rd and PTIR 5th of 7 funds in the 2x Long Palantir (PLTR) Category.
PLTU vs PTIR
7.5%by weight
PLTU −0.61pt a year
0.97%1.58%
PTIR 1.7×the volume
2.36M4.05M
PLTU vs PTIR Performance
−46.0%−45.3%
- PLTU 0.97%, better
- PTIR 1.58%
- PLTU $375M
- PTIR $302M
- PLTU −46.0%
- PTIR −45.3%, better
- PLTU 32.31%
- PTIR
- PLTU 10
- PTIR 2
- PLTU 2.36M sh
- PTIR 4.05M sh, better
- PLTU $60.75
- PTIR $22.66
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PLTU | PTIR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C52Higher | F8 |
| Mission | A89Higher | A88 |
| Risk | C41 | C41 |
| Tradability | B61 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A77Higher | B69 |
Rank among 2x Long Palantir (PLTR) funds
Same Category. PLTU and PTIR are both graded against the same 7 2x Long Palantir (PLTR) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PLTUB
PTIRC
In short
PLTU Palantir with the volume turned up. PLTU aims for 200% of PLTR's daily move and resets every night, so it behaves like a trading tool rather than a buy-and-hold sleeve, and it charges less than the median 2x PLTR fund.
PTIR A single-stock speed dial: PTIR aims to deliver twice Palantir's daily move, then resets each morning. GraniteShares has run it since 2024, and it trades heavily for a leveraged single-stock fund.
Stated mandate
PLTU The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the performance of Palantir Technologies Inc. common shares, before fees and expenses.
PTIR The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily percentage change of Palantir Technologies Inc., before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PLTU vs PTIR Holdings
How PLTU and PTIR differ
7.5%
Shared holdings make up 66.6% of PTIR and 7.5% of PLTU.
Level by level
- Holdings7.5%
Sector
| Sector | More in PLTUMore in PTIR | PLTU | PTIR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in PLTUMore in PTIR | PLTU | PTIR |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- PLTU100.0%
- PTIR100.0%
- PLTU3
- PTIR1
Asset class
- PLTU
- Equity
- PTIR
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in PLTU2
- In both1
- Only in PTIR0
Only in PLTU
2 securities, 21.1% of PLTU by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 50617.77%
- Goldman Sachs Fin Gov 465 Institut3.37%
Only in PTIR
0 securities, 0.0% of PTIR by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in PLTUMore in PTIR | PLTU | PTIR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palantir Technologies Inc-A | PTIR +59.16 points | 7.46% | 66.63% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PLTU vs PTIR Cost
Overpaying PTIR vs PLTU
$9,206
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PLTU 0.97%
$18,198
PTIR 1.58%
$27,404
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PLTU | PTIR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $2,719 | $1,007 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $9,959 | $3,516 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $27,404 | $9,206 |
- 0.97%PLTU, cheaper
- 1.58%PTIR
- Middle half of 2x Long Palantir (PLTR) funds
- Median 0.97%
PLTU 4th cheapest of 7 funds
PTIR 7th cheapest of 7 funds
PLTU vs PTIR Dividends
- PLTU 32.31%
- PTIR
- PLTU $17.13
- PTIR
- PLTU $0.22
- PTIR $1.55
- PLTU Sep 22, 2026
- PTIR Dec 29, 2025
- PLTU Sep 29, 2026
- PTIR Dec 31, 2025
- PLTU Quarterly
- PTIR Irregular
Distribution history
PLTU vs PTIR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PLTU 122.0%PTIR 147.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- PLTU 0.83PTIR 1.22
- Worst fall
- PLTU −79.7%PTIR −79.3%
- Market sensitivity
- PLTU 0.85PTIR 2.34
Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.58% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.58% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.58% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.