PLTU ranks 3rd and PLTW 4th of 7 funds in the 2x Long Palantir (PLTR) Category.
PLTU vs PLTW
4.1%by weight
PLTU −0.02pt a year
0.97%0.99%
PLTU 15.3×the volume
2.36M154K
PLTU vs PLTW Performance
−46.0%−18.4%
- PLTU 0.97%, better
- PLTW 0.99%
- PLTU $375M
- PLTW $125M
- PLTU −46.0%
- PLTW −18.4%, better
- PLTU 32.31%
- PLTW 68.37%, better
- PLTU 10
- PLTW 4
- PLTU 2.36M sh, better
- PLTW 154K sh
- PLTU $60.75
- PLTW $23.08
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PLTU | PLTW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C52Higher | D39 |
| Mission | A89 | A94Higher |
| Risk | C41 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | B61Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | F20 | |
| Durability | A77Higher | B62 |
Rank among 2x Long Palantir (PLTR) funds
Same Category. PLTU and PLTW are both graded against the same 7 2x Long Palantir (PLTR) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PLTUB
PLTWB
In short
PLTU Palantir with the volume turned up. PLTU aims for 200% of PLTR's daily move and resets every night, so it behaves like a trading tool rather than a buy-and-hold sleeve, and it charges less than the median 2x PLTR fund.
PLTW Most PLTR bull funds go 2x and reset daily. PLTW dials the amplification down to 1.2x, resets by the calendar week, and turns Palantir's volatility into a weekly cash payout instead of a capped options trade.
Stated mandate
PLTU The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the performance of Palantir Technologies Inc. common shares, before fees and expenses.
PLTW PLTW seeks weekly distributions and calendar-week returns equal to 1.2 times the calendar-week total return of Palantir common shares, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PLTU vs PLTW Holdings
How PLTU and PLTW differ
4.1%
Shared holdings make up 7.5% of PLTU and 4.1% of PLTW.
Level by level
- Holdings4.1%
Sector
No Sector split for PLTW.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in PLTUMore in PLTW | PLTU | PLTW |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- PLTU100.0%
- PLTW214.0%
- PLTU3
- PLTW3
Asset class
- PLTU
- Equity
- PLTW
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in PLTU2
- In both1
- Only in PLTW2
Only in PLTU
2 securities, 21.1% of PLTU by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 50617.77%
- Goldman Sachs Fin Gov 465 Institut3.37%
Only in PLTW
2 securities, 93.6% of PLTW by weight
- United States Treasury Bill 12/03/202682.83%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/203110.82%
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in PLTUMore in PLTW | PLTU | PLTW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palantir Technologies Inc-A | PLTU +3.34 points | 7.46% | 4.13% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PLTU vs PLTW Cost
Overpaying PLTW vs PLTU
$327
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PLTU 0.97%
$18,198
PLTW 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PLTU | PLTW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $1,746 | $34 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $6,565 | $122 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $18,525 | $327 |
- 0.97%PLTU, cheaper
- 0.99%PLTW
- Middle half of 2x Long Palantir (PLTR) funds
- Median 0.97%
PLTU 4th cheapest of 7 funds
PLTW 5th cheapest of 7 funds
PLTU vs PLTW Dividends
- PLTU 32.31%
- PLTW 68.37%, better
- PLTU $17.13
- PLTW $15.80
- PLTU $0.22
- PLTW $0.12
- PLTU Sep 22, 2026
- PLTW Oct 26, 2026
- PLTU Sep 29, 2026
- PLTW Oct 27, 2026
- PLTU Quarterly
- PLTW Weekly
Distribution history
PLTU vs PLTW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PLTU 122.0%PLTW 73.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- PLTU 0.83PLTW 0.88
- Worst fall
- PLTU −79.7%PLTW −57.4%
- Market sensitivity
- PLTU 0.85PLTW 0.37
Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 1.58%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 1.58%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.