Skip to content

PMAR vs PSMO

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March

PMARCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

PSMOBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSMO −0.30pt a year

PMAR0.79%PSMO0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PMAR 2.6×the volume

PMAR19KPSMO7.3K

5Y return · a year

PSMO +0.4pt

PMAR+9.3%PSMO+9.7%

PMAR vs PSMO Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+56.1%PMAR+59.2%PSMO

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. PMAR +56.1%. PSMO +59.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%40%Oct 2021May 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PMAR 0.79%
PSMO 0.49%, better
Fund size
PMAR $742M
PSMO $116M
1Y total return
PMAR +10.5%, better
PSMO +10.0%
Holdings
PMAR 3
PSMO 3
Avg volume (30D)
PMAR 19K sh, better
PSMO 7.3K sh
NAV per share
PMAR $48.93
PSMO $33.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PMAR: Cost 35, Risk 61, Mission not scored, Tradability 48, Holdings not scored, Durability 81. PSMO: Cost 70, Risk 54, Mission 95, Tradability 64, Holdings not scored, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for PMAR, PSMO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPMARPSMO
Cost30% weightD35A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightB61HigherC54
Tradability15% weightC48B64Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA81HigherB66

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PMAR and PSMO are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMO ranks 1st and PMAR 16th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 16CPFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 47
  4. Rank 16CPMARInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - MarchScore 47
  5. Rank 19CGJUNFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - JuneScore 45

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PMARCInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March

PSMOBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

In short

PMAR The March-start link in Innovator's twelve-month buffer chain: it follows the big S&P 500 ETF up to a cap and is built to absorb the first 15% of losses over each March-to-February outcome period.

PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.

Stated mandate

PMAR The Fund seeks to track the return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.

PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • PMAR The deal is written into the fund's terms: absorb SPY's first 15% of losses over an outcome period, give up gains above a cap in exchange.innovatoretfs.com
  • Fixed calendar. The outcome period runs March 1 to the end of February, then the cap resets under the same rules, so you always know when the terms change.innovatoretfs.com
  • A registered 1940 Act fund, not a bank-issued note, at a 0.79% expense ratio that lands right on the buffer-fund median.
  • Sits in the upper half of its buffer-fund peer group, one of the more solid takes on the defined-outcome playbook.
  • PSMO Charges 0.49% a year versus a 0.79% median across its 15%-buffer peer group, one of the lower-cost ways to own this structure.
  • Pacer's moderate SOS funds (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ) all price at 0.49%, while the Innovator power-buffer lineup (POCT, PJUL, PJAN) runs 0.79%.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, not an abstract index, so what's being buffered is a fund you can watch tick by tick.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • PMAR Buy mid-period and you get whatever buffer and upside are left, not the headline 15% and the full cap. The stated terms describe a complete March-to-February run.
  • 0.79% is the going rate in this cohort and well above plain S&P 500 exposure. The options sleeve that builds the buffer is what you're paying for.
  • Trades lightly, so spreads can widen; limit orders are the usual workaround. It also makes no regular distributions, so any return shows up in the share price.
  • PSMO Buffer and cap are engineered for the full one-year outcome period running October through September. Buy or sell mid-period and you may get neither in full.paceretfs.com
  • Upside stops at a cap reset each October. A runaway rally in the S&P 500 is the scenario this structure hands back in exchange for the 15% cushion.paceretfs.com
  • One of the quieter tickers in the buffer aisle, so spreads and order type matter more here than with the category's household names.

Full PMAR profile⁠

Full PSMO profile⁠

PMAR vs PSMO Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PMAR vs PSMO Cost

Overpaying PMAR vs PSMO

$5,382

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PMAR 0.79%

    $15,174

  • PSMO 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PMAR 0.79%
  • PSMO 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530PMAR $15,174PSMO $9,792

Year by year

YearPMARPSMOOverpaying
10$1,405$883$522
20$5,331$3,394$1,937
30$15,174$9,792$5,382

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%PMAR
  • 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds

PMAR 24th cheapest of 51 funds

PMAR vs PSMO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
PMAR None
PSMO None

Distribution history

PMARAll PMAR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMOAll PSMO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PMAR vs PSMO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • PMAR
  • PSMO
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: PMAR −10.8% · Jun 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−7.5%−5%−2.5%0%Oct 2021May 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PMAR 5.8%, betterPSMO 5.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PMAR 1.52, betterPSMO 1.31
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PMAR −10.8%PSMO −9.8%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PMAR 0.43PSMO 0.41

Popular comparisons

  • PMARCvsPSMJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsPSMJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PMARCvsPSMRB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PMARCvsBUFCB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.