PSMO ranks 1st and PMAR 16th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
PMAR vs PSMO
PSMO −0.30pt a year
0.79%0.49%
PMAR 2.6×the volume
19K7.3K
PSMO +0.4pt
+9.3%+9.7%
PMAR vs PSMO Performance
+56.1%+59.2%
- PMAR 0.79%
- PSMO 0.49%, better
- PMAR $742M
- PSMO $116M
- PMAR +10.5%, better
- PSMO +10.0%
- PMAR 3
- PSMO 3
- PMAR 19K sh, better
- PSMO 7.3K sh
- PMAR $48.93
- PSMO $33.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PMAR | PSMO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B61Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | C48 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A81Higher | B66 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. PMAR and PSMO are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PMARC
PSMOB
In short
PMAR The March-start link in Innovator's twelve-month buffer chain: it follows the big S&P 500 ETF up to a cap and is built to absorb the first 15% of losses over each March-to-February outcome period.
PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.
Stated mandate
PMAR The Fund seeks to track the return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.
PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PMAR vs PSMO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PMAR vs PSMO Cost
Overpaying PMAR vs PSMO
$5,382
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PMAR 0.79%
$15,174
PSMO 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PMAR | PSMO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $883 | $522 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $3,394 | $1,937 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $9,792 | $5,382 |
- 0.79%PMAR
- 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds
PMAR 24th cheapest of 51 funds
PMAR vs PSMO Dividends
- PMAR None
- PSMO None
Distribution history
PMAR vs PSMO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PMAR
- PSMO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PMAR 5.8%, betterPSMO 5.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- PMAR 1.52, betterPSMO 1.31
- Worst fall
- PMAR −10.8%PSMO −9.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- PMAR 0.43PSMO 0.41
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.