Skip to content
etf.net

PMJL vs PMJN

PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July

PMJLBCboe

PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June

PMJNBCboe

Overlap

1.5%by weight

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

PMJL0.50%PMJN0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

PMJN 2.1×the volume

PMJL2.33KPMJN4.9K

PMJL vs PMJN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.2%PMJL+4.3%PMJN

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. PMJL +5.2%. PMJN +4.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%1%2%3%6%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PMJL 0.50%
PMJN 0.50%
Fund size
PMJL $7M
PMJN $10M
1Y total return
PMJL +5.2%, better
PMJN +4.3%
Holdings
PMJL 4
PMJN 4
Avg volume (30D)
PMJL 2.33K sh
PMJN 4.9K sh, better
NAV per share
PMJL $27.08
PMJN $27.11
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PMJL: Cost 76, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 37, Holdings not scored, Durability 27. PMJN: Cost 76, Risk 36, Mission not scored, Tradability 41, Holdings not scored, Durability 36.
Pillar letters and Scores for PMJL, PMJN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPMJLPMJN
Cost30% weightA76A76
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC45HigherD36
Tradability15% weightD37C41Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightD27D36Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Max Buffer funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PMJL and PMJN are both graded against the same 20 S&P 500 Max Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Max Buffer⁠

Category · 20 funds
See all 20 ›

PMJL ranks 2nd and PMJN 4th of 20 funds in the S&P 500 Max Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 1BPMDEPGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - DecemberScore 63
  2. Rank 2BPMJLPGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - JulyScore 56
  3. Rank 2BPMSEPGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - SeptemberScore 56
  4. Rank 4BPMJNPGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - JuneScore 55
  5. Rank 4CPMMRPGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - MarchScore 55

PMJL vs PMJN Holdings

How PMJL and PMJN differ

Overlap by weight

1.5%

Shared holdings make up 1.9% of PMJN and 1.5% of PMJL.

Level by level

  • Holdings1 in both1.5%
  • Asset classAlternatives100%

Sector

No Sector split for PMJL and PMJN.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for PMJN.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • PMJL103.9%
  • PMJN102.9%

Securities held

  • PMJL3
  • PMJN3

Asset class

PMJL
Alternatives
PMJN
Alternatives

Holdings

  • Only in PMJL2
  • In both1
  • Only in PMJN2

Only in PMJL

2 securities, 100% of PMJL by weight

  • 4SPY Us 06/30/27 C14.9499.04%
  • 4SPY Us 06/30/27 P746.773.41%

Only in PMJN

2 securities, 100% of PMJN by weight

  • 4SPY Us 05/28/27 C15.1397.74%
  • 4SPY Us 05/28/27 P756.483.31%

Weight gaps

All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in PMJL and PMJN, widest gap first
HoldingMore in PMJLMore in PMJN
Net Current AssetsSame weight

All PMJL holdings⁠All PMJN holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PMJL vs PMJN Cost

Same expense ratio

$9,979

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PMJL 0.50%

    $9,979

  • PMJN 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PMJL 0.50%
  • PMJN 0.50%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530PMJL $9,979PMJN $9,979

Year by year

YearPMJLPMJN
10$900$900
20$3,460$3,460
30$9,979$9,979

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%PMJL
  • 0.50%PMJN
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Max Buffer funds
  • Median 0.52%

PMJL cheapest of 20 funds

PMJN cheapest of 20 funds

PMJL vs PMJN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
PMJL None
PMJN None

Distribution history

PMJLAll PMJL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PMJNAll PMJN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PMJL vs PMJN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PMJL 1.9%since Aug 2025PMJN 1.5%since Jul 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PMJL 0.98since Aug 2025PMJN 0.64since Jul 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PMJL −1.5%since Jul 2025PMJN −1.1%since Jun 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PMJL 0.15PMJN 0.11

Popular comparisons

  • PMJLBvsPMDEB

    PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PMJNBvsPMDEB

    PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PMJLBvsPMSEB

    PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PMJNBvsPMSEB

    PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PMJLBvsPMMRC

    PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - March

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PMJNBvsPMMRC

    PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - March

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.