Skip to content

PMTL vs SGDM

FIRST TRUST INDXX QUALITY PRECIOUS METALS MINERS ETF

PMTLCNYSE Arca

Sprott Gold Miners ETF

SGDMBNYSE Arca

Overlap

23.5%by weight

Expense ratio

SGDM −0.19pt a year

PMTL0.65%SGDM0.46%

Avg volume · 30D

SGDM 18.6×the volume

PMTL1.92KSGDM35.6K

PMTL vs SGDM Performance

Aug 3, 2026 – Nov 3, 2026

−0.5%PMTL+4.3%SGDM

Aug 3, 2026 to Nov 3, 2026. PMTL −0.5%. SGDM +4.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.10%20%30%40%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
PMTL 0.65%
SGDM 0.46%, better
Fund size
PMTL $2M
SGDM $581M
1Y total return
PMTL No data
SGDM +14.1%
Yield (12M)
PMTL No data
SGDM 1.11%
Holdings
PMTL 78
SGDM 49
Avg volume (30D)
PMTL 1.92K sh
SGDM 35.6K sh, better
NAV per share
PMTL $20.79
SGDM $66.52
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PMTL: Cost 26, Risk 81, Mission not scored, Tradability 24, Holdings 93, Durability 20. SGDM: Cost 68, Risk 67, Mission 78, Tradability 59, Holdings 70, Durability 60.
Pillar letters and Scores for PMTL, SGDM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPMTLSGDM
Cost30% weightD26B68Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA78
Risk15% weightA81HigherB67
Tradability15% weightF24B59Higher
Holdings10% weightA93HigherA70
Durability5% weightF20B60Higher

Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PMTL and SGDM are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Precious Metals Miners⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

SGDM ranks 2nd and PMTL 14th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.

  1. Rank 1BRINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETFScore 67
  2. Rank 2BGDXVanEck Gold Miners ETFScore 65
  3. Rank 2BSGDMSprott Gold Miners ETFScore 65
  4. Rank 2BSLVPiShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETFScore 65
  5. Rank 14CGOEXGlobal X Gold Explorers ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 14CPMTLFIRST TRUST INDXX QUALITY PRECIOUS METALS MINERS ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 16DSLVRSprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETFScore 38

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PMTLCFIRST TRUST INDXX QUALITY PRECIOUS METALS MINERS ETF

SGDMBSprott Gold Miners ETF

In short

PMTL No data

SGDM SGDM doesn't just rank gold miners by size. It tracks a custom-factors index of roughly 50 larger miners listed in Canada and the US, and charges 0.46%, under its peer group's median fee.

Stated mandate

PMTL No data

SGDM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, which targets larger gold companies listed on Canadian and major U.S. exchanges.

Why people hold it

PMTL No data

  • SGDM Fee of 0.46% sits under the median for precious-metals miner funds, and under both GDX (0.51%) and GDXJ (0.52%).
  • Rules-based and named out loud: it follows the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index (SOLGMCFT), and it has stayed close to that stated mandate.
  • Running since 2014, a long life for a thematic fund, and it holds about 50 larger gold companies rather than a sprawling list.
  • Lands in the upper half of the gold and silver miner group in our review, with high confidence in the underlying data.

Worth knowing

PMTL No data

  • SGDM Thinly traded next to the category's giants, so spreads can be wider and larger orders can push the price around.
  • The index sticks to Canadian and major US listings, so gold miners quoted only on other exchanges sit outside the portfolio.
  • One industry, driven by the gold price and how well mines actually run, so the ride is bumpier than a broad stock fund.

Full PMTL profile⁠

Full SGDM profile⁠

PMTL vs SGDM Holdings

How PMTL and SGDM differ

Overlap by weight

23.5%

Shared holdings make up 39.5% of SGDM and 28.2% of PMTL.

Level by level

  • Holdings15 in both23.5%
  • Countryby domicile60.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Sector1 Sector100%

Sector

Sector weights in PMTL and SGDM, widest gap first
SectorMore in PMTLMore in SGDMGap
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in PMTL and SGDM, widest gap first
CountryMore in PMTLMore in SGDMGap
CanadaSGDM +37.4 points
AustraliaPMTL +17.2 points
South AfricaPMTL +8.2 points
Hong KongPMTL +4.4 points
ChinaPMTL +3.9 points
MexicoPMTL +3.0 points
United KingdomSGDM +1.5 points
ColombiaPMTL +1.1 points
Other countries (4)PMTL +1.3 points

Outside the US: PMTL 75% developed, 25% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • PMTL36.1%
  • SGDM55.9%

Securities held

  • PMTL75
  • SGDM48

Asset class

PMTL
Equity
SGDM
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in PMTL60
  • In both15
  • Only in SGDM33

Only in PMTL

60 securities, 71.6% of PMTL by weight

  • Agnico Eagle Mines Limited5.83%
  • Barrick Mining Corporation3.97%
  • Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.3.74%

Only in SGDM

33 securities, 60.4% of SGDM by weight

  • Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.9.94%
  • Barrick Mining Corp.7.81%
  • Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.6.88%

Weight gaps

All 15 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in PMTL and SGDM, widest gap first
HoldingMore in PMTLMore in SGDMGap
Endeavour Mining PlcSGDM +1.94 points
Torex Gold Resources Inc.SGDM +1.81 points
Gold Fields Limited (ADR)GFIPMTL +1.73 points
DPM Metals Inc.SGDM +1.70 points
Newmont CorporationNEMSGDM +1.67 points
Coeur Mining, Inc.CDESGDM +1.65 points
OceanaGold CorporationSGDM +1.35 points
AngloGold Ashanti plcAUPMTL +1.34 points

All 75 PMTL holdings⁠All 48 SGDM holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PMTL vs SGDM Cost

Overpaying PMTL vs SGDM

$3,487

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PMTL 0.65%

    $12,717

  • SGDM 0.46%

    $9,230

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PMTL 0.65%
  • SGDM 0.46%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530PMTL $12,717SGDM $9,230

Year by year

YearPMTLSGDMOverpaying
10$1,163$830$333
20$4,440$3,195$1,245
30$12,717$9,230$3,487

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%PMTL
  • 0.46%SGDM, cheaper
  • Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
  • Median 0.52%

SGDM 7th cheapest of 18 funds

PMTL 12th cheapest of 18 funds

PMTL vs SGDM Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 3, 2026
Yield (12M)
PMTL No data
SGDM 1.11%
Payout (12M)
PMTL None
SGDM $0.73
Last payment
PMTL No data
SGDM $0.73
Ex-dividend
PMTL No data
SGDM Dec 18, 2025
Paid on
PMTL No data
SGDM Dec 22, 2025
Frequency
PMTL No data
SGDM Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

PMTLAll PMTL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SGDMAnnual · 9 paymentsAll SGDM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 21, 2017 $0.12; Dec 20, 2018 $0.09; Dec 19, 2019 $0.06; Dec 16, 2020 $0.09; Dec 15, 2021 $0.36; Dec 15, 2022 $0.35; Dec 14, 2023 $0.35; Dec 12, 2024 $0.29; Dec 18, 2025 $0.73. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

PMTL vs SGDM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PMTL No dataSGDM 40.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PMTL No dataSGDM 0.97
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PMTL No dataSGDM −45.0%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PMTL 0.00SGDM 0.71

PMTL and SGDM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • PMTLCvsRINGB

    FIRST TRUST INDXX QUALITY PRECIOUS METALS MINERS ETF · iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SGDMBvsRINGB

    Sprott Gold Miners ETF · iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PMTLCvsGDXB

    FIRST TRUST INDXX QUALITY PRECIOUS METALS MINERS ETF · VanEck Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SGDMBvsGDXB

    Sprott Gold Miners ETF · VanEck Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PMTLCvsSLVPB

    FIRST TRUST INDXX QUALITY PRECIOUS METALS MINERS ETF · iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SGDMBvsSLVPB

    Sprott Gold Miners ETF · iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.