Skip to content

PSMJ vs PSMO

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

PSMJBCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

PSMOBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

PSMJ0.49%PSMO0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PSMO 1.1×the volume

PSMJ6.64KPSMO7.3K

5Y return · a year

PSMJ +0.6pt

PSMJ+10.3%PSMO+9.7%

PSMJ vs PSMO Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+63.1%PSMJ+59.2%PSMO

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. PSMJ +63.1%. PSMO +59.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PSMJ 0.49%
PSMO 0.49%
Fund size
PSMJ $108M
PSMO $116M
1Y total return
PSMJ +8.2%
PSMO +10.0%, better
Yield (12M)
PSMJ 0.00%
PSMO No data
Holdings
PSMJ 3
PSMO 3
Avg volume (30D)
PSMJ 6.64K sh
PSMO 7.3K sh, better
NAV per share
PSMJ $34.43
PSMO $33.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PSMJ: Cost 70, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings not scored, Durability 63. PSMO: Cost 70, Risk 54, Mission 95, Tradability 64, Holdings not scored, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for PSMJ, PSMO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPSMJPSMO
Cost30% weightA70A70
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightC46C54Higher
Tradability15% weightC50B64Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB63B66Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PSMJ and PSMO are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMO ranks 1st and PSMJ 2nd of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PSMJBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

PSMOBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

In short

PSMJ Pacer's July-dated stop on the Swan SOS ladder: FLEX options on SPY that buffer the first 15% of a fall over a roughly one-year period, with upside capped in return. At 0.49%, it undercuts most of the buffer aisle.

PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.

Stated mandate

PSMJ The Fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.

PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • PSMJ Charges 0.49% a year against a 0.79% median for its buffered-SPY cohort, the same 0.79% Innovator's Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) charge for a similar job.
  • The deal is legible: FLEX options on SPY absorb the first 15% of a decline over the outcome period, and match the ETF's gains up to a cap struck each July.paceretfs.compaceretfs.com 2
  • Those FLEX options are customizable exchange-traded contracts settled through the Options Clearing Corporation, and Durango-based Swan Global Management sub-advises the strategy.paceretfs.com
  • One of four Moderate-series funds with staggered start months (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ, PSMO), so a July reset can be stacked against other entry points rather than standing alone.paceretfs.com
  • PSMO Charges 0.49% a year versus a 0.79% median across its 15%-buffer peer group, one of the lower-cost ways to own this structure.
  • Pacer's moderate SOS funds (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ) all price at 0.49%, while the Innovator power-buffer lineup (POCT, PJUL, PJAN) runs 0.79%.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, not an abstract index, so what's being buffered is a fund you can watch tick by tick.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • PSMJ The 15% buffer and the cap belong to the full outcome period. Step in mid-period and you inherit whatever cap and buffer remain, not the starting terms.paceretfs.com
  • Thinly traded next to the largest buffer funds, so spreads and limit orders deserve more of your attention at the point of entry.
  • No regular income stream here: the options structure delivers its result through share price rather than distributions.paceretfs.com
  • PSMO Buffer and cap are engineered for the full one-year outcome period running October through September. Buy or sell mid-period and you may get neither in full.paceretfs.com
  • Upside stops at a cap reset each October. A runaway rally in the S&P 500 is the scenario this structure hands back in exchange for the 15% cushion.paceretfs.com
  • One of the quieter tickers in the buffer aisle, so spreads and order type matter more here than with the category's household names.

Full PSMJ profile⁠

Full PSMO profile⁠

PSMJ vs PSMO Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PSMJ vs PSMO Cost

Same expense ratio

$9,792

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PSMJ 0.49%

    $9,792

  • PSMO 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PSMJ 0.49%
  • PSMO 0.49%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530PSMJ $9,792PSMO $9,792

Year by year

YearPSMJPSMO
10$883$883
20$3,394$3,394
30$9,792$9,792

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%PSMJ
  • 0.49%PSMO
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMJ 5th cheapest of 51 funds

PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds

PSMJ vs PSMO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
PSMJ 0.00%
PSMO No data
Payout (12M)
PSMJ None
PSMO None

Distribution history

Per share, 2021, same scale for both

PSMJ1 paymentAll PSMJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2021. Dec 23, 2021 $0.0038. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.00252021
PSMOAll PSMO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMJ vs PSMO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • PSMJ
  • PSMO
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: PSMO −9.8% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−7.5%−5%−2.5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PSMJ 6.3%PSMO 5.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PSMJ 1.47, betterPSMO 1.31
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PSMJ −10.9%PSMO −9.8%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PSMJ 0.47PSMO 0.41

Popular comparisons

  • PSMJBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPOCTC

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsPOCTC

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.