PSMO ranks 1st and SPBU 46th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
PSMO vs SPBU
PSMO −0.30pt a year
0.49%0.79%
SPBU 4.4×the volume
7.3K31.9K
PSMO vs SPBU Performance
+10.0%+6.7%
- PSMO 0.49%, better
- SPBU 0.79%
- PSMO $116M
- SPBU $202M
- PSMO +10.0%, better
- SPBU +6.7%
- PSMO 3
- SPBU 12
- PSMO 7.3K sh
- SPBU 31.9K sh, better
- PSMO $33.50
- SPBU $30.65
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PSMO | SPBU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | D35 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | C54Higher | F9 |
| Tradability | B64Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | A87 | |
| Durability | B66Higher | C43 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. PSMO and SPBU are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PSMOB
SPBUD
In short
PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.
SPBU Most buffer ETFs cap your upside. SPBU skips the ceiling: its twelve underlying funds take a stated spread off the S&P 500 ETF's return instead, while buffering the first 15% of losses. Laddered monthly, so no single start date defines your year.
Stated mandate
PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.
SPBU The Fund seeks to achieve its objective through a laddered portfolio of twelve AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped ETFs. The underlying strategy seeks to track SPY market-price returns over specified one-year periods while protecting against the first 15% of SPY losses, subject to a stated spread.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PSMO vs SPBU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PSMO vs SPBU Cost
Overpaying SPBU vs PSMO
$5,382
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PSMO 0.49%
$9,792
SPBU 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PSMO | SPBU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $1,405 | $522 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $5,331 | $1,937 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $15,174 | $5,382 |
- 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
- 0.79%SPBU
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds
SPBU 24th cheapest of 51 funds
PSMO vs SPBU Dividends
- PSMO None
- SPBU None
Distribution history
PSMO vs SPBU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PSMO 5.9%SPBU 9.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- PSMO 1.31SPBU 1.13
- Worst fall
- PSMO −9.8%SPBU −8.3%
- Market sensitivity
- PSMO 0.41SPBU 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.