Skip to content

PSMO vs SPBU

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

PSMOBCboe

AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF

SPBUDCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSMO −0.30pt a year

PSMO0.49%SPBU0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

SPBU 4.4×the volume

PSMO7.3KSPBU31.9K

PSMO vs SPBU Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.0%PSMO+6.7%SPBU

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. PSMO +10.0%. SPBU +6.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PSMO 0.49%, better
SPBU 0.79%
Fund size
PSMO $116M
SPBU $202M
1Y total return
PSMO +10.0%, better
SPBU +6.7%
Holdings
PSMO 3
SPBU 12
Avg volume (30D)
PSMO 7.3K sh
SPBU 31.9K sh, better
NAV per share
PSMO $33.50
SPBU $30.65
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PSMO: Cost 70, Risk 54, Mission 95, Tradability 64, Holdings not scored, Durability 66. SPBU: Cost 35, Risk 9, Mission not scored, Tradability 44, Holdings 87, Durability 43.
Pillar letters and Scores for PSMO, SPBU, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPSMOSPBU
Cost30% weightA70HigherD35
Mission25% weightA95Not scored
Risk15% weightC54HigherF9
Tradability15% weightB64HigherC44
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA87
Durability5% weightB66HigherC43

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PSMO and SPBU are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMO ranks 1st and SPBU 46th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 46DJNEUAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jun ETFScore 38
  4. Rank 46DSPBUAllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETFScore 38
  5. Rank 48DMARUAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETFScore 37

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PSMOBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

SPBUDAllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF

In short

PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.

SPBU Most buffer ETFs cap your upside. SPBU skips the ceiling: its twelve underlying funds take a stated spread off the S&P 500 ETF's return instead, while buffering the first 15% of losses. Laddered monthly, so no single start date defines your year.

Stated mandate

PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.

SPBU The Fund seeks to achieve its objective through a laddered portfolio of twelve AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped ETFs. The underlying strategy seeks to track SPY market-price returns over specified one-year periods while protecting against the first 15% of SPY losses, subject to a stated spread.

Why people hold it

  • PSMO Charges 0.49% a year versus a 0.79% median across its 15%-buffer peer group, one of the lower-cost ways to own this structure.
  • Pacer's moderate SOS funds (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ) all price at 0.49%, while the Innovator power-buffer lineup (POCT, PJUL, PJAN) runs 0.79%.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, not an abstract index, so what's being buffered is a fund you can watch tick by tick.paceretfs.com
  • SPBU No upside cap. The underlying Buffer15 Uncapped funds subtract a stated spread from the S&P 500 ETF's one-year return rather than stopping gains at a ceiling.
  • Twelve overlapping one-year outcome periods in one ticket, so the portfolio staggers its resets instead of hanging on a single entry date.
  • The 15% buffer is written into the design: the underlying strategy absorbs the first 15% of S&P 500 ETF losses over each one-year period.
  • At 0.79%, the fee sits right at the median for its buffered S&P 500 peer group, so the uncapped twist costs no premium over standard capped 15% buffers.

Worth knowing

  • PSMO Buffer and cap are engineered for the full one-year outcome period running October through September. Buy or sell mid-period and you may get neither in full.paceretfs.com
  • Upside stops at a cap reset each October. A runaway rally in the S&P 500 is the scenario this structure hands back in exchange for the 15% cushion.paceretfs.com
  • One of the quieter tickers in the buffer aisle, so spreads and order type matter more here than with the category's household names.
  • SPBU The spread is what you pay for no cap. Upside arrives as the index return minus that stated spread, so the fund trails plain S&P 500 exposure in strong years.
  • Cost isn't the edge here. Another laddered buffer fund in the same group, BUFF, charges 0.10% at the fund level.
  • Launched in 2025 and thinly traded, so the track record is short and the gap between bid and ask can matter as much as the expense ratio.

Full PSMO profile⁠

Full SPBU profile⁠

PSMO vs SPBU Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PSMO vs SPBU Cost

Overpaying SPBU vs PSMO

$5,382

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PSMO 0.49%

    $9,792

  • SPBU 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PSMO 0.49%
  • SPBU 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530SPBU $15,174PSMO $9,792

Year by year

YearPSMOSPBUOverpaying
10$883$1,405$522
20$3,394$5,331$1,937
30$9,792$15,174$5,382

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
  • 0.79%SPBU
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds

SPBU 24th cheapest of 51 funds

PSMO vs SPBU Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
PSMO None
SPBU None

Distribution history

PSMOAll PSMO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SPBUAll SPBU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMO vs SPBU Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PSMO 5.9%SPBU 9.0%since Apr 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PSMO 1.31SPBU 1.13since Apr 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PSMO −9.8%SPBU −8.3%since Mar 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PSMO 0.41SPBU 0.75

Popular comparisons

  • PSMOBvsPSMJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SPBUDvsPSMJB

    AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SPBUDvsPSMRB

    AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SPBUDvsBUFCB

    AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.