PSMO ranks 1st and XOCT 20th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
PSMO vs XOCT
PSMO −0.36pt a year
0.49%0.85%
XOCT 2.1×the volume
7.3K15.4K
PSMO +2.5pt
+12.6%+10.1%
PSMO vs XOCT Performance
+10.0%+8.3%
- PSMO 0.49%, better
- XOCT 0.85%
- PSMO $116M
- XOCT $38M
- PSMO +10.0%, better
- XOCT +8.3%
- PSMO 3
- XOCT 4
- PSMO 7.3K sh
- XOCT 15.4K sh, better
- PSMO $33.50
- XOCT $40.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PSMO | XOCT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | F13 |
| Mission | A95Higher | A87 |
| Risk | C54Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | B64 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | B66 | |
| Durability | B66Higher | B64 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. PSMO and XOCT are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PSMOB
XOCTC
In short
PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.
XOCT Most buffer funds hand over upside to buy protection. This one leans the other way: roughly 2x the price move of the S&P 500 ETF it references, up to a yearly cap, with the first 15% of losses cushioned. October is its reset month.
Stated mandate
PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.
XOCT The Fund seeks approximately twice the positive price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust, subject to a 10.26% upside cap and protection against the first 15% of losses during the current outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PSMO vs XOCT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PSMO vs XOCT Cost
Overpaying XOCT vs PSMO
$6,407
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PSMO 0.49%
$9,792
XOCT 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PSMO | XOCT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $1,508 | $625 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $5,706 | $2,312 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $16,199 | $6,407 |
- 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
- 0.85%XOCT
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds
XOCT 37th cheapest of 51 funds
PSMO vs XOCT Dividends
- PSMO None
- XOCT None
Distribution history
PSMO vs XOCT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PSMO 5.9%XOCT 4.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PSMO 1.31, betterXOCT 1.16
- Worst fall
- PSMO −9.8%XOCT −10.0%
- Market sensitivity
- PSMO 0.41XOCT 0.34
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.