Skip to content

PSMO vs XOCT

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

PSMOBCboe

FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - October

XOCTCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSMO −0.36pt a year

PSMO0.49%XOCT0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

XOCT 2.1×the volume

PSMO7.3KXOCT15.4K

3Y return · a year

PSMO +2.5pt

PSMO+12.6%XOCT+10.1%

PSMO vs XOCT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.0%PSMO+8.3%XOCT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. PSMO +10.0%. XOCT +8.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PSMO 0.49%, better
XOCT 0.85%
Fund size
PSMO $116M
XOCT $38M
1Y total return
PSMO +10.0%, better
XOCT +8.3%
Holdings
PSMO 3
XOCT 4
Avg volume (30D)
PSMO 7.3K sh
XOCT 15.4K sh, better
NAV per share
PSMO $33.50
XOCT $40.47
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PSMO: Cost 70, Risk 54, Mission 95, Tradability 64, Holdings not scored, Durability 66. XOCT: Cost 13, Risk 51, Mission 87, Tradability 78, Holdings 66, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for PSMO, XOCT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPSMOXOCT
Cost30% weightA70HigherF13
Mission25% weightA95HigherA87
Risk15% weightC54HigherC51
Tradability15% weightB64A78Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB66
Durability5% weightB66HigherB64

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PSMO and XOCT are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMO ranks 1st and XOCT 20th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 20CGOCTFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - OctoberScore 43
  4. Rank 20CXOCTFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - OctoberScore 43
  5. Rank 25CGDECFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - DecemberScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PSMOBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

XOCTCFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - October

In short

PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.

XOCT Most buffer funds hand over upside to buy protection. This one leans the other way: roughly 2x the price move of the S&P 500 ETF it references, up to a yearly cap, with the first 15% of losses cushioned. October is its reset month.

Stated mandate

PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.

XOCT The Fund seeks approximately twice the positive price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust, subject to a 10.26% upside cap and protection against the first 15% of losses during the current outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • PSMO Charges 0.49% a year versus a 0.79% median across its 15%-buffer peer group, one of the lower-cost ways to own this structure.
  • Pacer's moderate SOS funds (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ) all price at 0.49%, while the Innovator power-buffer lineup (POCT, PJUL, PJAN) runs 0.79%.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, not an abstract index, so what's being buffered is a fund you can watch tick by tick.paceretfs.com
  • XOCT Double-speed upside, not half: the fund aims for about twice the positive price return of its S&P 500 ETF reference, up to a cap set for each one-year period.cboe.com
  • The first 15% of reference losses is absorbed over the outcome period, so ordinary market chop lands on the buffer before it lands on you.ftportfolios.com
  • The rules are written in advance. FLEX options on the S&P 500 ETF lock the cap and buffer for the October-to-October stretch, so the terms are known before you commit.cboe.com
  • One rung of a 12-month ladder: First Trust runs an Enhance & Moderate Buffer fund for every calendar month, and this is the October start line.ftportfolios.com

Worth knowing

  • PSMO Buffer and cap are engineered for the full one-year outcome period running October through September. Buy or sell mid-period and you may get neither in full.paceretfs.com
  • Upside stops at a cap reset each October. A runaway rally in the S&P 500 is the scenario this structure hands back in exchange for the 15% cushion.paceretfs.com
  • One of the quieter tickers in the buffer aisle, so spreads and order type matter more here than with the category's household names.
  • XOCT 0.85% a year runs above the typical fee in its buffer peer group, and laddered rivals like BUFF charge a fraction of that.
  • Upside has two ceilings: gains stop at the period's cap, and the mandate follows price return, so the reference ETF's dividends don't flow through.
  • Built for full-period holders and thinly traded. Buy partway through the October cycle and your effective cap and remaining cushion differ from the headline terms.

Full PSMO profile⁠

Full XOCT profile⁠

PSMO vs XOCT Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PSMO vs XOCT Cost

Overpaying XOCT vs PSMO

$6,407

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PSMO 0.49%

    $9,792

  • XOCT 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PSMO 0.49%
  • XOCT 0.85%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530XOCT $16,199PSMO $9,792

Year by year

YearPSMOXOCTOverpaying
10$883$1,508$625
20$3,394$5,706$2,312
30$9,792$16,199$6,407

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
  • 0.85%XOCT
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds

XOCT 37th cheapest of 51 funds

PSMO vs XOCT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
PSMO None
XOCT None

Distribution history

PSMOAll PSMO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XOCTAll XOCT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMO vs XOCT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PSMO 5.9%XOCT 4.6%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PSMO 1.31, betterXOCT 1.16
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PSMO −9.8%XOCT −10.0%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PSMO 0.41XOCT 0.34

Popular comparisons

  • PSMOBvsPSMJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XOCTCvsPSMJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - October · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XOCTCvsPSMRB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - October · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XOCTCvsBUFCB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - October · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.