SPDW ranks 2nd and PXF 16th of 20 funds in the Developed International Core Category.
PXF vs SPDW
SPDW −0.40pt a year
0.43%0.03%
SPDW 26.2×the volume
114K2.99M
PXF +1.5pt
+11.4%+9.9%
PXF vs SPDW Performance
+89.5%+53.3%
- PXF 0.43%
- SPDW 0.03%, better
- PXF $2.94B
- SPDW $40.1B
- PXF +27.1%, better
- SPDW +18.5%
- PXF 3.25%, better
- SPDW 3.05%
- PXF 1032
- SPDW 2447
- PXF 114K sh
- SPDW 2.99M sh, better
- PXF $74.63
- SPDW $48.15
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PXF | SPDW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F5 | A90Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B61Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | C43 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | A77 | A90Higher |
| Durability | B55 | A76Higher |
Rank among Developed International Core funds
Same Category. PXF and SPDW are both graded against the same 20 Developed International Core funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PXFC
SPDWA
In short
PXF Most developed-market index funds size a company by its stock price. PXF uses the RAFI method instead, weighting roughly 1,000 non-US names by fundamental measures of the business, which pulls the portfolio toward value.
SPDW Developed markets outside the US, roughly 2,400 stocks deep, for three basis points. State Street's 2007-vintage international core: priced at the category floor and built wide rather than mega-cap-only.
Stated mandate
PXF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of its underlying index before fees and expenses, primarily by investing in securities that make up that index.
SPDW The fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the total return performance of the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PXF vs SPDW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PXF vs SPDW Cost
Overpaying PXF vs SPDW
$8,024
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PXF 0.43%
$8,662
SPDW 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PXF | SPDW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $776 | $55 | $721 |
| 20 | $2,994 | $216 | $2,778 |
| 30 | $8,662 | $638 | $8,024 |
- 0.43%PXF
- 0.03%SPDW, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed International Core funds
- Median 0.10%
SPDW cheapest of 20 funds
PXF 19th cheapest of 20 funds
PXF vs SPDW Dividends
- PXF 3.25%, better
- SPDW 3.05%
- PXF $2.49
- SPDW $1.52
- PXF $0.55
- SPDW $0.72
- PXF Sep 21, 2026
- SPDW Jun 22, 2026
- PXF Sep 25, 2026
- SPDW Jun 26, 2026
- PXF Quarterly
- SPDW Twice a year
Distribution history
PXF vs SPDW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PXF
- SPDW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PXF 12.6%, betterSPDW 12.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- PXF 1.57, betterSPDW 1.27
- Worst fall
- PXF −26.8%, betterSPDW −29.7%
- Market sensitivity
- PXF 0.92SPDW 1.05
PXF and SPDW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.43% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.43% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.43% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
