VCRM ranks 4th and PZT 41st of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
PZT vs VCRM
VCRM −0.16pt a year
0.28%0.12%
VCRM 12.4×the volume
54.7K679K
PZT vs VCRM Performance
−2.0%+1.1%
- PZT 0.28%
- VCRM 0.12%, better
- PZT $134M
- VCRM $2.2B
- PZT −2.0%
- VCRM +1.1%, better
- PZT 3.99%, better
- VCRM 3.81%
- PZT 1322
- VCRM 2588
- PZT 54.7K sh
- VCRM 679K sh, better
- PZT $21.33
- VCRM $73.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PZT | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A76 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D32 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | D25 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | B59 | A81Higher |
| Durability | B61 | A74Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. PZT and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PZTC
VCRMA
In short
PZT One of the few ETFs built only for New York municipal bonds, and it fishes at the long end of the curve. Tracks a long-term New York muni index, aims for income exempt from federal tax and free of the AMT, and has been running since 2007.
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
PZT The Fund seeks current income exempt from federal income tax through a portfolio of New York municipal securities. It generally invests at least 80% of assets in municipal securities comprising its declared index.
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PZT vs VCRM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PZT vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying PZT vs VCRM
$3,235
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PZT 0.28%
$5,755
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PZT | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $509 | $220 | $289 |
| 20 | $1,976 | $859 | $1,117 |
| 30 | $5,755 | $2,520 | $3,235 |
- 0.28%PZT
- 0.12%VCRM, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
PZT 24th cheapest of 63 funds
PZT vs VCRM Dividends
- PZT 3.99%, better
- VCRM 3.81%
- PZT $0.85
- VCRM $2.82
- PZT $0.08
- VCRM $0.21
- PZT Oct 19, 2026
- VCRM Oct 1, 2026
- PZT Oct 23, 2026
- VCRM Oct 5, 2026
- PZT Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
PZT vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PZT 8.7%VCRM 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- PZT 0.02VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- PZT −18.7%VCRM −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- PZT 1.38VCRM 0.17
Popular comparisons
- 0.28% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.