QALT ranks 4th and SHRT 23rd of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
QALT vs SHRT
QALT −0.55pt a year
0.80%1.35%
QALT 1.8×the volume
17.7K9.75K
QALT vs SHRT Performance
+6.9%−4.6%
- QALT 0.80%, better
- SHRT 1.35%
- QALT $194M
- SHRT $13M
- QALT +6.9%, better
- SHRT −4.6%
- QALT
- SHRT 0.07%
- QALT 27
- SHRT 541
- QALT 17.7K sh, better
- SHRT 9.75K sh
- QALT $25.77
- SHRT $7.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QALT | SHRT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | D38 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A70Higher | F24 |
| Tradability | B59Higher | D32 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B64Higher | B55 |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. QALT and SHRT are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QALTA
SHRTD
In short
QALT One ticker, several hedge fund playbooks: SEI stacks sub-advisers running directional, event-driven and arbitrage strategies, and measures itself against 3-month T-bills instead of the S&P 500. It undercuts the typical alternatives fund on fees.
SHRT One of the few ETFs built to lean against the market: Gotham's stock pickers run a long book and a bigger short book, targeting roughly 50% net short US equity exposure.
Stated mandate
QALT The fund seeks positive absolute returns across market cycles with reduced correlation to stocks and bonds. It pursues this through multiple underlying funds and sub-advisers using directional or tactical, event-driven, and arbitrage approaches.
SHRT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and positive returns during declining markets. It actively manages long and short equity and equity-related positions, primarily in companies traded on U.S. markets, targeting approximately 50% net short exposure.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QALT vs SHRT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QALT vs SHRT Cost
Overpaying SHRT vs QALT
$8,767
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QALT 0.80%
$15,346
SHRT 1.35%
$24,113
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QALT | SHRT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,422 | $2,346 | $924 |
| 20 | $5,393 | $8,678 | $3,285 |
| 30 | $15,346 | $24,113 | $8,767 |
- 0.80%QALT, cheaper
- 1.35%SHRT
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
QALT 4th cheapest of 29 funds
SHRT 19th cheapest of 29 funds
QALT vs SHRT Dividends
- QALT
- SHRT 0.07%
- QALT
- SHRT $0.0052
- QALT $0.17
- SHRT $0.0052
- QALT Oct 5, 2026
- SHRT Dec 10, 2025
- QALT Oct 6, 2026
- SHRT Dec 11, 2025
- QALT Quarterly
- SHRT Annual
Distribution history
QALT vs SHRT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QALT 7.2%SHRT 13.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- QALT 0.77SHRT −0.68
- Worst fall
- QALT −4.9%SHRT −27.8%
- Market sensitivity
- QALT 0.24SHRT −0.61
Popular comparisons
- 0.80% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.35% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.35% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.35% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.