TSMG ranks 1st and QCML 111th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
QCML vs TSMG
TSMG −0.77pt a year
1.53%0.76%
QCML 24.4×the volume
1.68M69K
QCML vs TSMG Performance
−41.9%+40.8%
- QCML 1.53%
- TSMG 0.76%, better
- QCML $45M
- TSMG $28M
- QCML −41.9%
- TSMG +40.8%, better
- QCML 2
- TSMG 5
- QCML 1.68M sh, better
- TSMG 69K sh
- QCML $18.17
- TSMG $33.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QCML | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F3 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A79 | A79 |
| Risk | B63 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | A94Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A77Higher | B67 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. QCML and TSMG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QCMLC
TSMGA
In short
QCML Two times Qualcomm's move, one day at a time. QCML never owns a QCOM share: it rents the exposure through swaps, resets every night, and costs 1.50% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026 (7.39% gross).
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
QCML The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily percentage change of Qualcomm Inc.'s common stock, before fees and expenses.
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QCML vs TSMG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QCML vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying QCML vs TSMG
$12,050
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QCML 1.53%
$26,706
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QCML | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,639 | $1,353 | $1,286 |
| 20 | $9,685 | $5,142 | $4,543 |
| 30 | $26,706 | $14,656 | $12,050 |
- 1.53%QCML
- 0.76%TSMG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
TSMG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
QCML 301st cheapest of 315 funds
QCML vs TSMG Dividends
- QCML None
- TSMG
- QCML
- TSMG $2.73
- QCML
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- QCML
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- QCML
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
QCML vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QCML 117.9%TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- QCML 0.25TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- QCML −68.8%TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- QCML 6.12TSMG 3.81
Popular comparisons
- 1.53% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.53% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.53% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.