Skip to content
etf.net

QMNV vs QQMY

FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - November

QMNVDCboe

Corgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series

QQMYCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

QQMY −0.60pt a year

QMNV0.90%QQMY0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

QMNV 3.8×the volume

QMNV8.76KQQMY2.29K

QMNV vs QQMY Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

+0.8%QMNV−1.1%QQMY

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. QMNV +0.8%. QQMY −1.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−4%−2%0%2%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
QMNV 0.90%
QQMY 0.30%, better
Fund size
QMNV $44M
QQMY $2M
1Y total return
QMNV +13.4%
QQMY No data
Holdings
QMNV 3
QQMY 4
Avg volume (30D)
QMNV 8.76K sh, better
QQMY 2.29K sh
NAV per share
QMNV $25.00
QQMY $25.12
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QMNV: Cost 5, Risk 68, Mission not scored, Tradability 62, Holdings not scored, Durability 64. QQMY: Cost 87, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 18, Holdings not scored, Durability 22.
Pillar letters and Scores for QMNV, QQMY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQMNVQQMY
Cost30% weightF5A87Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB68HigherC47
Tradability15% weightB62HigherF18
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB64HigherF22

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QMNV and QQMY are both graded against the same 15 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 15 funds
See all 15 ›

QQMY ranks 8th and QMNV 14th of 15 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 8CQQJLCorgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40
  2. Rank 8CQQMYCorgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May SeriesScore 40
  3. Rank 14DQMFEFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 37
  4. Rank 14DQMNVFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - NovemberScore 37

QMNV vs QQMY Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QMNV vs QQMY Cost

Overpaying QMNV vs QQMY

$10,891

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QMNV 0.90%

    $17,040

  • QQMY 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QMNV 0.90%
  • QQMY 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530QMNV $17,040QQMY $6,149

Year by year

YearQMNVQQMYOverpaying
10$1,593$545$1,048
20$6,015$2,113$3,902
30$17,040$6,149$10,891

Expense ratio

  • 0.90%QMNV
  • 0.30%QQMY, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

QQMY cheapest of 15 funds

QMNV 13th cheapest of 15 funds

QMNV vs QQMY Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
QMNV None
QQMY None

Distribution history

QMNVAll QMNV payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QQMYAll QQMY payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QMNV vs QQMY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QMNV 7.9%since Dec 2024QQMY No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QMNV 1.11since Dec 2024QQMY No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QMNV −12.8%since Nov 2024QQMY No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QMNV 0.59QQMY 0.98

Popular comparisons

  • QMNVDvsQBQFB

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - November · AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QQMYCvsQBQFB

    Corgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series · AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QMNVDvsNJANB

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - November · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QQMYCvsNJANB

    Corgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QMNVDvsNOCTC

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - November · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QQMYCvsNOCTC

    Corgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.