RWM ranks 4th and QQDN 32nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
QQDN vs RWM
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 16200.0×the volume
1.85K30M
QQDN vs RWM Performance
−4.1%−10.1%
- QQDN 0.95%
- RWM 0.95%
- QQDN $1M
- RWM $163M
- QQDN −4.1%, better
- RWM −10.1%
- QQDN 5.29%, better
- RWM 3.31%
- QQDN 1
- RWM 3
- QQDN 1.85K sh
- RWM 30M sh, better
- QQDN $21.83
- RWM $14.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QQDN | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C49 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | D27 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | F22 | B69Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QQDN and RWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QQDNC
RWMB
In short
QQDN The only ETF aiming at -2x the daily move of the Nasdaq-100 Mega Index, the top slice of the Nasdaq-100 by weight. A short on today's mega-cap leaders, not a fixed Mag 7 list. 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
QQDN QQDN seeks daily results equal to two times the inverse of the Nasdaq-100 Mega Index's daily performance, before fees and expenses.
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QQDN vs RWM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QQDN vs RWM Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QQDN 0.95%
$17,869
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QQDN | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%QQDN
- 0.95%RWM
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QQDN 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
QQDN vs RWM Dividends
- QQDN 5.29%, better
- RWM 3.31%
- QQDN $1.18
- RWM $0.48
- QQDN $0.18
- RWM $0.09
- QQDN Sep 23, 2026
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- QQDN Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- QQDN Quarterly
- RWM Quarterly
Distribution history
QQDN vs RWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QQDN 41.1%RWM 18.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- QQDN −0.72RWM −0.99
- Worst fall
- QQDN −51.8%RWM −43.7%
- Market sensitivity
- QQDN −2.78RWM −1.23
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.